Mini Mart Magnate
I am just here for my amusement.
cadman wrote: »
Why don't we wait on the real bowl games and see what happens. Oh wait the ACC only has two teams in the real bowl games. Of course you need to brag now.
FSU beating the Golden Eagles is hardly dominance. One mediocre team beat another mediocre team.
Kentucky losing to #21 Northwestern means nothing. The Gators beat Kentucky and we were bad this year.
I don't see two ACC teams in the top four, do you?
If you were to look at the top ten teams the dominant conferences would be SEC and the Big Ten.
Big Ten is 3-0 out of 8, they might be the dominant one if you look at the bowl record so far.
But hey, Miami might beat Wisconsin.
Conchy Critter wrote: »
and nobody cares. To argue which conference is better is stupid.
The conference dominance argument was created by the ESPN Sports Media to help boost viewership.
The SEC fans were stupid enough to fall for it. :rotflmao
HomerSimpson wrote: »
actually no, it was created to point out the fallacy of the Nole Homer's who claimed greatness by having a decent records with a schedule of sub-par teams
Cane Pole wrote: »
Rooting for the SEC is about the only real fun for me out of the 50 or so bowls there are.
Disagree if you wish, but dont be a deek about it.
Bobber wrote: »
ACC is 4-3 out of 9 bowl games thus far.
SEC is 0-3 out of 9 bowl games thus far.
ACC vs SEC is 1-0 out of 3 or 4 bowl games thus far.
So which is the dominant conference?
Just stirring the pot.....
SAENole wrote: »
Just go ahead and award the National Championship trophy to the entire SEC (including the lowly gata) and let's be done with it.
SAENole wrote: »
And on the 8th day, the SEC created God.
mustang190 wrote: »
And then taught the other conferences how to play modern football!