Editing rule...Check this out Griz

Scminnow

There's already a "report" button. Why not incentives the report of pron by rewarding members with a bag of soft plastics if thier report "results in the arrest and conviction" lol seems you could expand the moderation pool. But what do I know? I never reported anything cause there was nothing in it for ME! Lol carry on

capt.nate

Gary S. Colecchio wrote: »

No it's not "better" at all.

It makes no sense to force someone to read through a number of posts only to find something is already sold. No one does that.

With all due respect that is an unnecessary and stupid workaround made necessary to fix something else you determined necessary, but much easier to work around by those who you dont want working around it.

Gee, just like the old days.

**** gary! stop confusing people with facts!

Scminnow

Maybe instead of the little triangle report button it read "report abuse" "win a prize"

capt.nate

i agree. the rule is stupid and only affects those that arent trying to edit a picture which is the reason the rule was implemented. i know griz thinks im "trying to find ways to make 'their' jobs harder but im only trying to point out the facts. i want to see this place flourish and be like it was before.

by the way, i edited my pic on post #32 again an hour ago.

GT Fish

My threads lately have produced a lot of clicks.

Michael Repper

nate wrote: »

i agree. the rule is stupid and only affects those that arent trying to edit a picture which is the reason the rule was implemented. i know griz thinks im "trying to find ways to make 'their' jobs harder but im only trying to point out the facts. i want to see this place flourish and be like it was before.

bu the way, i edited my pic on post #32 again an hour ago.

Why are they keeping a bad decision that does not fix the problem? :banghead

capt.nate

i may be wrong but i think its because they dont want to admit they are wrong.

Scminnow

nate wrote: »

i may be wrong but i think its because they dont want to admit they are wrong.

Give them some time. They are like an Obama voter. They know they made the wrong decision but don't want to admit it. Fact

Griz

Guess I had a knee jerk. After much discussion reset.

GT Fish

:thumbsup Good call bud!

capt.nate

Griz wrote: »

Guess I had a knee jerk. After much discussion reset.

can i put that in my signature?

Scminnow

Thanks

Gary S. Colecchio

Griz wrote: »

Guess I had a knee jerk. After much discussion reset.

Good man. Thank you.

Michael Repper

Griz wrote: »

Guess I had a knee jerk. After much discussion reset.

Thanks! :thumbsup

grady30wa

Gary S. Colecchio wrote: »

He's saying that its an ineffective solution which is easily worked around by those who insist upon doing so, and who will see this a invitation and challenge.

As far as keeping those who have no inclination to do anything but correct their posts, for example in the classifieds, it is extremely effective.

If editing posts is outlawed only outlaws will edit posts.