Handguns
Subscribe
Home› Off Topic
Do wind farms actually cause climate change?
A new study suggests that green-energy-creating windmills make the air they're stirring significantly warmer
POSTED ON APRIL 30, 2012, AT 2:00 PM http://theweek.com/article/index/227375/do-wind-farms-actually-cause-climate-change
Here's a curveball on climate change: New research published in the journal Nature Climate Change suggests that large wind farms might have a warming effect on the local climate. Many countries are rapidly expanding their capacity to generate electricity using wind-driven turbines as they try to cut emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases created by the burning of fossil fuels. But are wind farms contributing to the very problem they're supposed to help solve? Here, a brief guide:
How much do wind farms heat up the air?
Researchers at the State University of New York at Albany looked at satellite data from 2003 to 2011 across a wide swath of west Texas, where four of the world's largest wind farms were built during that period. Night-time temperatures in the air above the wind-power facilities were 1.3 degrees higher than in other areas. "We attribute this warming primarily to wind farms," say the authors of the study.
What accounts for the warming?
Normally, temperatures drop after the sun sets, as cooler air settles on the ground. But windmills create turbulence that stirs up that chilly air, mixing it with a warmer layer on top and preventing temperatures from falling as much as they otherwise would. These findings confirm previous research in 2010 that found windmills can make nights warmer and days cooler in the area immediately around them.
So the problem is local, not global?
Yes. But wind farms cover more and more vast stretches of land every day. The world's wind-power capacity jumped 21 percent last year, and is expected to grow from 238 gigawatts of electricity at any one time to 500 gigawatts by the end of 2016 as more wind farms are built.
Is this really so bad?
It's certainly not as bad as man-made warming that prompted the push to use wind, solar, and other forms of green energy in the first place. But it's also not without its costs. Consider west Texas, which went from 111 windmills in 2003 to 2,358 in 2011. Rising temperatures risk compounding problems such as a brutal drought the region has experienced over the last few years, which could have devastating effects on agriculture.
What's the solution?
Researchers see two ways to prevent the phenomenon from doing much damage. One is reducing the size of windmill blades so they don't stir up the air as much. But of course, smaller turbine blades would generate less power. Another option is locating new wind farms in areas with considerable air turbulence so the windmills wouldn't do anything to thermal layers that Mother Nature isn't already doing herself.
POSTED ON APRIL 30, 2012, AT 2:00 PM http://theweek.com/article/index/227375/do-wind-farms-actually-cause-climate-change
Here's a curveball on climate change: New research published in the journal Nature Climate Change suggests that large wind farms might have a warming effect on the local climate. Many countries are rapidly expanding their capacity to generate electricity using wind-driven turbines as they try to cut emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases created by the burning of fossil fuels. But are wind farms contributing to the very problem they're supposed to help solve? Here, a brief guide:
How much do wind farms heat up the air?
Researchers at the State University of New York at Albany looked at satellite data from 2003 to 2011 across a wide swath of west Texas, where four of the world's largest wind farms were built during that period. Night-time temperatures in the air above the wind-power facilities were 1.3 degrees higher than in other areas. "We attribute this warming primarily to wind farms," say the authors of the study.
What accounts for the warming?
Normally, temperatures drop after the sun sets, as cooler air settles on the ground. But windmills create turbulence that stirs up that chilly air, mixing it with a warmer layer on top and preventing temperatures from falling as much as they otherwise would. These findings confirm previous research in 2010 that found windmills can make nights warmer and days cooler in the area immediately around them.
So the problem is local, not global?
Yes. But wind farms cover more and more vast stretches of land every day. The world's wind-power capacity jumped 21 percent last year, and is expected to grow from 238 gigawatts of electricity at any one time to 500 gigawatts by the end of 2016 as more wind farms are built.
Is this really so bad?
It's certainly not as bad as man-made warming that prompted the push to use wind, solar, and other forms of green energy in the first place. But it's also not without its costs. Consider west Texas, which went from 111 windmills in 2003 to 2,358 in 2011. Rising temperatures risk compounding problems such as a brutal drought the region has experienced over the last few years, which could have devastating effects on agriculture.
What's the solution?
Researchers see two ways to prevent the phenomenon from doing much damage. One is reducing the size of windmill blades so they don't stir up the air as much. But of course, smaller turbine blades would generate less power. Another option is locating new wind farms in areas with considerable air turbulence so the windmills wouldn't do anything to thermal layers that Mother Nature isn't already doing herself.
Live music 7 nights a week: http://www.terrafermata.com/_events
Replies
Ever notice why those temp graphs they show don't start till the 10th century?
Might it be due to the fact that no one was keeping records of average annual temps before the 10th century?
propaganda much?
all the news will show you is the far right of the graph...
its just the earth's temp varies on its own...
Ya'but some can't understand that, they went to brain washing school.
No water to cool the ground, so a noticeable warmth.
I'm sorry but the turbines are "wind driven" No wind, no turbine activity.
Who sponsored this study? FPL? Or big oil?