Skip to main content
Home Conservation Front

They are back.

CCA FLORIDA CONFRONTS THE LATEST ATTEMPT BY COMMERCIAL NETTERS TO CIRCUMVENT THE GILL NET BAN

_____________________________

Once again a small group of commercial netters are trying to get the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to allow larger mesh sizes in nets so they can be used as gill nets. The netters are now going to local county commissions and asking them to approve resolutions to the FWC urging them to increase the allowable mesh size. The netting group is not telling the whole story.
“CCA Florida has sent letters to the Governor’s Office and to all coastal County Commissioners providing information regarding the prohibition on the use of gill nets”, said Jeff Miller, CCA Florida Chairman of the Board. “We are concerned that Collier and other county commissions are not familiar with the history of FWC actions and the legal findings of fact in the previous lawsuits, so we have prepared a package of information on the past decisions that we have sent to the coastal County Commissions”.
The measures being pushed by the netting group include a resolution which would allow net fishers to use a larger size mesh in their nets. However; all the current and best scientific information and testimony indicates that marine nets with mesh sizes exceeding two inches are gill nets. The critical factor in determining whether a net is a seine net or a gill net is mesh size. Modifying regulations to allow nets which exceed two inches stretched mesh would not be allowed by the net limitation amendment. Net studies, expert testimony and all court cases agree on that point.
In November 1994 an overwhelming 72 percent of Florida’s voters said yes to the constitutional amendment limiting marine net fishing. The amendment includes both a prohibition on the use of gill and entangling nets in all state waters and a size limit on other nets. Although the restrictions have been in place for nearly 16 years, there are still factions within the commercial industry who refuse to accept the legal reality that the constitutional prohibition on gill nets means no gill nets.
The last time the netting group went to the FWC in 2008 their request to increase the mesh sizes was again rejected by the Commission. Here are two of the strong comments made by Commissioners at that meeting.
“This is not a science question, the resource has rebounded. This constitutional amendment passed by a remarkable margin and our predecessors created a bright line definition, done objectively, and upheld in litigation,” said FWC Commissioner Ken Wright. “I am adamantly in favor of keeping the current two inch regulation. We are Trustees of a decision and bound to follow the will of the people”.
“Going to a larger mesh size has the intent of creating a gill net. We can’t point to a dog and call it a cat,” said FWC Commissioner Brian Yablonski. “We are bound by duty to the law and must respect the rule of law”.
Since 1994, there have been numerous lawsuits, attempts to create enforcement loopholes, and outright scams all designed to invalidate or circumvent provisions of the constitutional amendment. All have failed. The Florida Legislature, Florida Courts, and state agencies have upheld the clear intent of Florida voters.
“CCA Florida will continue to be the outspoken advocate and protector of the Constitutional Amendment which prohibits the use of gill nets and other damaging nets” said CCA Florida Chairman Jeff Miller.


I saw the letter from the Collier County Commission recommending an increase in the mesh size at the Naples CCA banquet on Saturday.
"If I can't win, I won't play." - Doris Colecchio.

"Well Gary, the easiest way to look tall is to stand in a room full of short people." - Curtis Bostick

"All these forums, with barely any activity, are like a neglected old cemetery that no one visits anymore."- anonymouse
«13456716

Replies

  • CalusaCalusa Posts: 11,874 AG
    I saw the letter from the Collier County Commission recommending an increase in the mesh size at the Naples CCA banquet on Saturday.

    I bet the commissioners bought the line, "the larger mesh will allow all those little ones to escape". Or else they're in cahoots with commercials.
  • ANUMBER1ANUMBER1 Posts: 13,227 AG
    Which group is this?
    I am glad to only be a bird hunter with bird dogs...being a shooter or dog handler or whatever other niche exists to separate appears to generate far too much about which to worry.
  • Gary S. ColecchioGary S. Colecchio Posts: 24,905 AG
    Grix, I would guess.
    "If I can't win, I won't play." - Doris Colecchio.

    "Well Gary, the easiest way to look tall is to stand in a room full of short people." - Curtis Bostick

    "All these forums, with barely any activity, are like a neglected old cemetery that no one visits anymore."- anonymouse
  • Sopchoppy RedneckSopchoppy Redneck Posts: 1,421 Officer
    OPEN YER EYES!! Do you really believe that these folks want to harm the very fishery that provides their livelihood? The net mesh is to small!! Y'all complain about the small fish that gets discarded and then want to raise hell when the fishers recommend doing something about it!! Every FWC person that has gone out with these fellas and witnessed the larger mesh in action against the smaller mesh has stated that the larger mesh is better for the fishery!!!! Quit being blinded by your dislike of the commercial fishers and you will see that the larger mesh is what is best :)

    PS: As for the comment by the idiot commissioner, just what does he think happens to the small fish when they hit the small mesh of the current nets?
    YouDontLikeMe.jpg
  • FrisbeeFrisbee Posts: 2,314 Captain
    I just want to make it as hard as possible for commercial rapists to **** the ocean and benefit from it.
    I don't care about the dirt bag chuckleheads drug-abusing. wife-beating, incestuous Commercial Rapists. They don't love Sportsmen either so we are even. That is the line in the sand. It isn't about making it better for commercial dirtbags. It is about taking away what they think is their right to ruin our fisheries. Screw em.
    I hope I made my self clear. they can be reformed...they could work at Wal-mart with their skill sets...till they get caught stealing there too.
  • Gary S. ColecchioGary S. Colecchio Posts: 24,905 AG
    I and thankfully most everyone else sees through this charade most clearly.

    There is a series of lies relentlessly forwarded annually which you as an FS moderator should be ashamed to repeat, much less advance. The first one is insulting our intelligence with the "you don't understand that the larger mesh size is better for the fish" nonsense. The most insulting is that that our "hatred" of these people is driving us to drive them out of their traditional livelihood. The last lie is that all the FWC guys think that increasing the net size is a good idea. I know a bunch of them and have never heard any of them say anything like that at all.

    The net limitation ban has proven to be the most beneficial tool ever employed to recover inshore fisheries enacted by the state and enforced by the will of the overwhelming majority of the people of Florida, who have voiced no regrets in the 18 years that have passed since then.

    The use of those nets was directly responsible for the reduction of inshore fish stocks. The people employing them were directly responsible for that reduction have they should not have the ability to do that again.

    You need to reconsider your standing as a representative of this site.
    "If I can't win, I won't play." - Doris Colecchio.

    "Well Gary, the easiest way to look tall is to stand in a room full of short people." - Curtis Bostick

    "All these forums, with barely any activity, are like a neglected old cemetery that no one visits anymore."- anonymouse
  • Capt EasyCapt Easy Posts: 203 Officer

    You need to reconsider your standing as a representative of this site.

    Yes, Please don't let the truth get in the way of the company line:)
  • Gary S. ColecchioGary S. Colecchio Posts: 24,905 AG
    I just told the truth. Anyone who misrepresents it as egregiously as this needs to rethink their position in a company committed to it.
    "If I can't win, I won't play." - Doris Colecchio.

    "Well Gary, the easiest way to look tall is to stand in a room full of short people." - Curtis Bostick

    "All these forums, with barely any activity, are like a neglected old cemetery that no one visits anymore."- anonymouse
  • Sopchoppy RedneckSopchoppy Redneck Posts: 1,421 Officer
    I and thankfully most everyone else sees through this charade most clearly.

    There is a series of lies relentlessly forwarded annually which you as an FS moderator should be ashamed to repeat, much less advance. The first one is insulting our intelligence with the "you don't understand that the larger mesh size is better for the fish" nonsense. The most insulting is that that our "hatred" of these people is driving us to drive them out of their traditional livelihood. The last lie is that all the FWC guys think that increasing the net size is a good idea. I know a bunch of them and have never heard any of them say anything like that at all.

    The net limitation ban has proven to be the most beneficial tool ever employed to recover inshore fisheries enacted by the state and enforced by the will of the overwhelming majority of the people of Florida, who have voiced no regrets in the 18 years that have passed since then.

    The use of those nets was directly responsible for the reduction of inshore fish stocks. The people employing them were directly responsible for that reduction have they should not have the ability to do that again.

    You need to reconsider your standing as a representative of this site.
    1: prove that the larger mesh is nonsense! The mullet fishermen have shown that it is better!
    2: Where did I say that you are driving them from their livelihood "get yer facts strait Gary"!
    3: I said the FWC guys that have gone out with them! I doubt those that you know would be willing or able to go out on one of their boats!!
    4: Before you start calling me a liar, you best get your facts in order !!
    The only thing that you said above that has any resemblance to the truth is that the ban did help the fisheries! The changing of the mesh size will in no way hurt anything "except maybe yer feelings" and will allow most juvenile fish to pass through the net, instead of getting tangled in it "as they do now" and dying!!!!!


    PS: You know who to talk to, if you want me gone!! GO FOR IT :)
    YouDontLikeMe.jpg
  • MattDMattD Posts: 167 Deckhand
    The mullet market is all aboput roe. I really oubt this had anything to do with "juvenile fish."

    What you are trying to say is: We are tired of catching all these male fish that are worth less money. We only want the really big ones that are full of eggs. Thats where the money is at.

    If you want to stop getting mullet gilled in your nets maybe the size should be changed to 1.5" or 1", that would take care of the problem wouldn't it?

    Matt
  • Sopchoppy RedneckSopchoppy Redneck Posts: 1,421 Officer
    I don't know why I even try, but here goes one more time.
    A 1" mesh will catch what size fish?
    Small fish and some large fish!A 3" mesh will catch what size fish?
    Large fish, while allowing small fish to swim thru it!
    It aint rocket science fellas :)
    YouDontLikeMe.jpg
  • Gary S. ColecchioGary S. Colecchio Posts: 24,905 AG
    It certainly aint' . And it's obvious to me by your lack of understanding that you don't make a living doing it.

    The argument for the larger mesh size is that all the little fish can swim through it and be free! Which is nonsense. The other argument is that the net size now forces them to kill fish. Which is totally absurd.

    I'm not calling you a liar. I'm calling you ignorant. Which is something you seem to enjoy celebrating.
    "If I can't win, I won't play." - Doris Colecchio.

    "Well Gary, the easiest way to look tall is to stand in a room full of short people." - Curtis Bostick

    "All these forums, with barely any activity, are like a neglected old cemetery that no one visits anymore."- anonymouse
  • FS Karl SnapperFS Karl Snapper Posts: 285 Officer
    The sole purpose for wanting a larger mesh size is to gill/entangle fish, which is, thankfully, against the constitution nowadays.
  • MattDMattD Posts: 167 Deckhand
    Not sure where you are from but apparently your mullet school differently than ours do here in Tampa Bay. Typically here you don't get juvenile mullet schooling with the larger ones. They tend to get eaten in the deeper water so they stay in the shallows.

    Matt
  • Sopchoppy RedneckSopchoppy Redneck Posts: 1,421 Officer
    It certainly aint' . And it's obvious to me by your lack of understanding that you don't make a living doing it.

    The argument for the larger mesh size is that all the little fish can swim through it and be free! Which is nonsense. The other argument is that the net size now forces them to kill fish. Which is totally absurd.

    I'm not calling you a liar. I'm calling you ignorant. Which is something you seem to enjoy celebrating.
    How many mullet boats have you worked on Gary?
    How many mullet fishers do you personally know?
    Tell us "O" wise one. What makes you qualified to call me ignorant? Cause in doing so, you imply a great knowledge on the subject.
    Matt
    Most of our mullet up here in NW Florida is caught in 6 foot or less of water!
    YouDontLikeMe.jpg
  • CalusaCalusa Posts: 11,874 AG
    Most of our mullet up here in NW Florida is caught in 6 foot or less of water!

    And finger mullet don't school with adult, roe-bearing female mullet. Thus, the real reason why netters want a larger mesh - not to "save the lives" of fish they'll never target or incidentally catch, but to gill those larger roe mullet. Big, easy money, and as pointed out above, constitutionally outlawed.

    In fact in my opinion, the net ban didn't go far enough. But that's another thread.
  • Got TA GoGot TA Go Posts: 2,608 Captain
    Calusa wrote: »
    In fact in my opinion, the net ban didn't go far enough. But that's another thread.

    X2

    I guess it's just like the statements that we've heard about increasing the mess size on Fish Traps, since they will let the small ones go and can be designed not to let Red Snapper in.

    Rob
    www.gottagofishinginkeywest.com


    Hero's Don't Wear Capes....They Wear Dog Tags.
  • Gary S. ColecchioGary S. Colecchio Posts: 24,905 AG
    I know Denise, and I know Grix and I know a lot about what happens to things like nets when you put them in the water. And what happens is not the picture you or Grix paints to people who don't know. And that is that there is not one big net stretched tightly at 4 corners so that there is a 3 inch square aperature that a fish can see and can leisurely swim through to avoid capture. The reality is something else as anyone who has thrown a cast net knows. And these things are masquerading as cast nets. The can also be tied together to be larger than their allowable size, which is also difficult to detect.

    Fish do not often engage those nets perpendiculary but obliquely and will turn when they find an opening. Then they can get stuck in it. If the mesh size was smaller this would not happen.

    So maybe you would feel more comfortable here: http://fishingforfreedom.net ? You can ask Dave if he has a moderator's job open. Or you could write an article about what evil Godless bastards Wickstrom, Forsgren and Colecchio are!

    Commercial Netters Want Larger Net Size

    If you were at the Florida Guides Association meeting on Sunday March 4, you heard FGA Captain and Board Member Gary Colecchio identify a new threat to the fishing resource. Some commercial netters are attempting to persuade the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commissions to allow larger mesh nets. Recreational anglers view this a way to work around the gill net ban.

    CCA Florida has put out a call to action alerting the public to this issue. In their release CCA explains that a small group of commercial netters are going to county commissions and asking them to approve resolutions to the FWC urging them to increase the allowable mesh size. According to CCA, the netting group is not telling the whole story.

    - Captain Ron Presely
    "If I can't win, I won't play." - Doris Colecchio.

    "Well Gary, the easiest way to look tall is to stand in a room full of short people." - Curtis Bostick

    "All these forums, with barely any activity, are like a neglected old cemetery that no one visits anymore."- anonymouse
  • ANUMBER1ANUMBER1 Posts: 13,227 AG
    Got TA Go wrote: »
    X2

    I guess it's just like the statements that we've heard about increasing the mess size on Fish Traps, since they will let the small ones go and can be designed not to let Red Snapper in.

    Rob
    Now you have shown your ignorance. If you know your target fish(fishtraps, red grouper) and what bottom they frequent, ya don't catch many snapper. If you can't tell the diff. between a show of RS ang RG spikes you don't need to be fishing.
    I am glad to only be a bird hunter with bird dogs...being a shooter or dog handler or whatever other niche exists to separate appears to generate far too much about which to worry.
  • GT FishGT Fish Posts: 9,448 Officer
    OPEN YER EYES!! Do you really believe that these folks want to harm the very fishery that provides their livelihood? The net mesh is to small!! Y'all complain about the small fish that gets discarded and then want to raise hell when the fishers recommend doing something about it!! Every FWC person that has gone out with these fellas and witnessed the larger mesh in action against the smaller mesh has stated that the larger mesh is better for the fishery!!!! Quit being blinded by your dislike of the commercial fishers and you will see that the larger mesh is what is best :)

    PS: As for the comment by the idiot commissioner, just what does he think happens to the small fish when they hit the small mesh of the current nets?
    Yes I believe they want every fish for money.I remember when there was no mullet run..I don't want that crap again!
    mousey.gif
    61903c544aca27b57fb2aa29e6bc4a3b.gif
    gnat.gifWzz6I.gif
  • HialeahAnglerHialeahAngler Posts: 9,612 Admiral
    stop eating mullet ya buncha rednecks.
    friedpeacocks.jpg
  • ANUMBER1ANUMBER1 Posts: 13,227 AG
    I don't know Griz, but I know that a gill net is a very good way to target a certain size fish.

    Gary, I like to see how a cast net can be tied to circumvent the law, They are measured differently than a seine, 14' from the horn to the leadline no matter how much bunt or the mesh size. Know why? Because they are hand thrown.
    That is the law.

    Don't post CCA B.S.as fact.
    I am glad to only be a bird hunter with bird dogs...being a shooter or dog handler or whatever other niche exists to separate appears to generate far too much about which to worry.
  • snake birdsnake bird Posts: 1,023 Officer
    stop eating mullet ya buncha rednecks.
    100_2951.jpg
  • HialeahAnglerHialeahAngler Posts: 9,612 Admiral
  • ANUMBER1ANUMBER1 Posts: 13,227 AG
    GT Fish wrote: »
    Yes I believe they want every fish for money.I remember when there was no mullet run..I don't want that crap again!
    I remember every mullet run from 1980 on... You musta been drunk.
    I am glad to only be a bird hunter with bird dogs...being a shooter or dog handler or whatever other niche exists to separate appears to generate far too much about which to worry.
  • ANUMBER1ANUMBER1 Posts: 13,227 AG
    basssman wrote: »
    100_2951.jpg
    Finest kind.
    I am glad to only be a bird hunter with bird dogs...being a shooter or dog handler or whatever other niche exists to separate appears to generate far too much about which to worry.
  • GT FishGT Fish Posts: 9,448 Officer
    ANUMBER1 wrote: »
    I remember every mullet run from 1980 on... You musta been drunk.
    East coast? That and the spanish Mackeral run that stopped for a couple years..Yeah i was probably drunk too..
    mousey.gif
    61903c544aca27b57fb2aa29e6bc4a3b.gif
    gnat.gifWzz6I.gif
  • HialeahAnglerHialeahAngler Posts: 9,612 Admiral
    GT Fish wrote: »
    East coast? That and the spanish Mackeral run that stopped for a couple years..Yeah i was probably drunk too..

    yeah you must've been. some people are kArazy. the nets destroyed the mackerel for several years and the mullet as well. dweebs.
    friedpeacocks.jpg
  • ANUMBER1ANUMBER1 Posts: 13,227 AG
    GT Fish wrote: »
    East coast? That and the spanish Mackeral run that stopped for a couple years..Yeah i was probably drunk too..
    No, west coast.. Too many yankees on the east coast. Couldn't abide them.
    I am glad to only be a bird hunter with bird dogs...being a shooter or dog handler or whatever other niche exists to separate appears to generate far too much about which to worry.
  • Gary S. ColecchioGary S. Colecchio Posts: 24,905 AG
    ANUMBER1 wrote: »
    I

    Don't post CCA B.S.as fact.

    When I do I'll tell you. I wasn't talking about the cast net variation. And don't presume to lecture me on the law , if you please.
    "If I can't win, I won't play." - Doris Colecchio.

    "Well Gary, the easiest way to look tall is to stand in a room full of short people." - Curtis Bostick

    "All these forums, with barely any activity, are like a neglected old cemetery that no one visits anymore."- anonymouse
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Digital Now Included!

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

Preview This Month's Issue

Buy Digital Single Issues

Don't miss an issue.
Buy single digital issue for your phone or tablet.

Buy Single Digital Issue on the Florida Sportsman App

Other Magazines

See All Other Magazines

Special Interest Magazines

See All Special Interest Magazines

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Florida Sportsman stories delivered right to your inbox.

Advertisement

Phone Icon

Get Digital Access.

All Florida Sportsman subscribers now have digital access to their magazine content. This means you have the option to read your magazine on most popular phones and tablets.

To get started, click the link below to visit mymagnow.com and learn how to access your digital magazine.

Get Digital Access

Not a Subscriber?
Subscribe Now