Skip to main content
Home Off Topic

Industrial wind farm decommissioned after only 20 years.

Big BatteryBig Battery Posts: 23,097 AG
Ooops... that will leave a mark.

An industrial wind facility in Kewaunee County, Wisconsin has been decommissioned after just 20 years of service because the turbines are no longer cost effective to maintain and operate. The decommissioning of the 14 turbines took many people by surprise, even local government officials and the farmer who had five of the turbines on his property.



«134

Replies

  • Mister-JrMister-Jr Posts: 30,013 AG
    Ooops... that will leave a mark.

    An industrial wind facility in Kewaunee County, Wisconsin has been decommissioned after just 20 years of service because the turbines are no longer cost effective to maintain and operate. The decommissioning of the 14 turbines took many people by surprise, even local government officials and the farmer who had five of the turbines on his property.



    During that 20 year period what were the operational costs and did it produce any air or water pollution? 
    Vote for the other candidate
  • Mister-JrMister-Jr Posts: 30,013 AG
    Cullen said the windmills are coming down because, at nearly 20 years old, they simply are not as efficient as the modern windmills WPS operates elsewhere.

    https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/local/kewaunee-county/2018/10/10/wps-closing-kewaunee-county-wind-energy-farm/1593586002/
    Vote for the other candidate
  • pottydocpottydoc Posts: 5,643 Admiral
    Obviously it wasn’t particularly efficient, or eco iCal, or they wouldn’t be trashing it after just 20 years. I don’t believe there’s a lot of power plants closed down after 20 years because they’re not worth keeping up. I wonder how many Federally protected birds it killed in 20 years. 
  • Mister-JrMister-Jr Posts: 30,013 AG
    pottydoc said:
    Obviously it wasn’t particularly efficient, or eco iCal, or they wouldn’t be trashing it after just 20 years. I don’t believe there’s a lot of power plants closed down after 20 years because they’re not worth keeping up. I wonder how many Federally protected birds it killed in 20 years. 
    They are replacing, not trashing.  Is your car as efficient as it was 20 years ago?
    Vote for the other candidate
  • dragon baitdragon bait Posts: 11,245 AG
    pottydoc said:
    Obviously it wasn’t particularly efficient, or eco iCal, or they wouldn’t be trashing it after just 20 years. I don’t believe there’s a lot of power plants closed down after 20 years because they’re not worth keeping up. I wonder how many Federally protected birds it killed in 20 years. 
    Do you think other power producers are immune from upgrades? 
  • Big BatteryBig Battery Posts: 23,097 AG
    How much electricity can we afford to keep subsidizing?
  • Mister-JrMister-Jr Posts: 30,013 AG
    How much electricity can we afford to keep subsidizing?
    I think someone smarter than me would need to figure that out.  As long as there are federal regulations governing the production there will always be subsidies. 
    Vote for the other candidate
  • TarponatorTarponator Posts: 19,981 AG

    How much electricity can we afford to keep subsidizing?
    Good question, but do you think that other methods of electricity generation aren't subsidized?
  • pottydocpottydoc Posts: 5,643 Admiral
    Oh, I see. If you call it replacing, that’s different. I guess they’re junking the old ones instead of trashing them. Yeah, that’s much different. dragon bait said:
    pottydoc said:
    Obviously it wasn’t particularly efficient, or eco iCal, or they wouldn’t be trashing it after just 20 years. I don’t believe there’s a lot of power plants closed down after 20 years because they’re not worth keeping up. I wonder how many Federally protected birds it killed in 20 years. 
    Do you think other power producers are immune from upgrades? 
    Replacing with new is much different than upgrading. 

    None of you nature lovers wants to comment on the amount of raptors killed every year by wind turbins? 

  • TarponatorTarponator Posts: 19,981 AG
    How many is that?
  • Big BatteryBig Battery Posts: 23,097 AG

    How much electricity can we afford to keep subsidizing?
    Good question, but do you think that other methods of electricity generation aren't subsidized?
    Go ahead and elaborate...
  • cadmancadman Posts: 43,680 AG
    edited November 2018 #13
    How much electricity can we afford to keep subsidizing?
    Could you define subsidized? Are tax deductions for certain activities subsidies? Are tax credits for certain activities subsidies? Is it just government handouts? Do we include tax credits to the end user?

    You need to be specific on your definition of a subsidy before anyone can say who gets what for what. 

    I forgot. Are we taking fedaral, state, and local or just federal or some combination?

    Former Mini Mart Magnate

    I am just here for my amusement. 

  • Team SabatageTeam Sabatage Posts: 13,014 AG
    What's your point?  20 year lifespan is about normal for a nuclear plant costing hundreds of times more.  Look up San Onofre nuclear plant and how things are going for it. 
    They blew 75 million on a rebuild that should have lasted 20 years in 2009.  In 2012 it closed because of being rebuilt poorly and will now cost 45 million to decommission.
    Ratepayers on the hook both through government spending on the project and having to pay for the utilities messing up.
    Those birds?  I don't see any when I hunt the wind fields in Wyoming.  
    Strap me in, tie me down and roll me a bone, I'm getting on an airplane and I'm flying home...
  • dragon baitdragon bait Posts: 11,245 AG
    Would the  Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain be considered a subsidy to the oil industry seeing as they are tasked to protect the commercial ships in the area (I.E.oil).
  • TarponatorTarponator Posts: 19,981 AG

    How much electricity can we afford to keep subsidizing?
    Good question, but do you think that other methods of electricity generation aren't subsidized?
    Go ahead and elaborate...
    There's no need.  The point has already been made.

    If you are a bit unclear, take a look at Dragon's post above for one example.
  • pottydocpottydoc Posts: 5,643 Admiral
    How many is that?
    According to Audubon, between 140,000-380,000 a year. That’s just the protected ones like condors, Golden eagles, and bald eagles. 
  • treemanjohntreemanjohn Posts: 7,998 Admiral
    The powers that be have already made their money off the project. The same evil rich people that you condemn are the same evil rich people that you empower. Seems strange to me
    We’re like the piggy bank that everybody is robbing, and that ends
  • mplspugmplspug Posts: 16,014 AG
    Would the  Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain be considered a subsidy to the oil industry seeing as they are tasked to protect the commercial ships in the area (I.E.oil).
    Considering how oil production, or more over, products derived from crude effect every aspect of our lives, if you want to consider it a subsidy, it is a subsidy for is all.
    Just dropping grenades in OT
  • Team SabatageTeam Sabatage Posts: 13,014 AG
    pottydoc said:
    How many is that?
    According to Audubon, between 140,000-380,000 a year. That’s just the protected ones like condors, Golden eagles, and bald eagles. 
    According to Audubon...Seeing how their own annual counts and reports to the US F&W Service estimate that there are a total of 463 Condors, 70,000 Bald Eagles and 39,000 golden Eagles in the lower 48, I highly doubt that 140,000 to 300,000 are killed by turbines each year.  I hunt under turbines in Western Wyoming.  I see no increase in dead birds from before the windmills existed to now and I don't see many dead birds at all.
    Strap me in, tie me down and roll me a bone, I'm getting on an airplane and I'm flying home...
  • TarponatorTarponator Posts: 19,981 AG
    edited November 2018 #21
    pottydoc said:
    How many is that?
    According to Audubon, between 140,000-380,000 a year. That’s just the protected ones like condors, Golden eagles, and bald eagles. 
    Really?  That seems a bit high to me, but let's have a look at the source of that info.  Kindly share where you got that.  Thanks...Mike
  • TarponatorTarponator Posts: 19,981 AG
    edited November 2018 #22

    If so, those numbers are hardly just the protected ones.  Here's the article that Audubon cites:


    Abstract

    Wind energy has emerged as a promising alternative to fossil fuels, yet the impacts of wind facilities on wildlife remain unclear. Prior studies estimate between 10,000 and 573,000 fatal bird collisions with U.S. wind turbines annually; however, these studies do not differentiate between turbines with a monopole tower and those with a lattice tower, the former of which now comprise the vast majority of all U.S. wind turbines and the latter of which are largely being de-commissioned. We systematically derived an estimate of bird mortality for U.S. monopole turbines by applying inclusion criteria to compiled studies, identifying correlates of mortality, and utilizing a predictive model to estimate mortality along with uncertainty. Despite measures taken to increase analytical rigor, the studies we used may provide a non-random representation of all data; requiring industry reports to be made publicly available would improve understanding of wind energy impacts. Nonetheless, we estimate that between 140,000 and 328,000 (mean = 234,000) birds are killed annually by collisions with monopole turbines in the contiguous U.S. We found support for an increase in mortality with increasing turbine hub height and support for differing mortality rates among regions, with per turbine mortality lowest in the Great Plains. Evaluation of risks to birds is warranted prior to continuing a widespread shift to taller wind turbines. Regional patterns of collision risk, while not obviating the need for species-specific and local-scale assessments, may inform broad-scale decisions about wind facility siting.


    I don't see any mention of that number referring to only the protected ones, but perhaps I'm missing something, and thus the question.


  • pottydocpottydoc Posts: 5,643 Admiral
    edited November 2018 #23
    pottydoc said:
    How many is that?
    According to Audubon, between 140,000-380,000 a year. That’s just the protected ones like condors, Golden eagles, and bald eagles. 
    Really?  That seems a bit high to me, but let's have a look at the source of that info.  Kindly share where you got that.  Thanks...Mike

    Uhhhh...Audubon. Like in my post you quoted. I think the protected number was Smithsonian. I looked at several articles. Protected or not, that’s a whole pile of birds, and it’s common knowdge that many are protected birds and other raptors. The big, open, grassy fields their built on attract lots of the prey animals that raptors feed on. There’s a bunch of stuff out there on it if you want to look. If you have issues with the number, take it up with the Audubon Society. I remember reading that the companies were given permits (for lack of a better word) to kill the birds. It’s been a while, I’ll see if I can find it. 
  • pottydocpottydoc Posts: 5,643 Admiral
    edited November 2018 #24
    Way too much to copy and paste. Do a search for “Permit to kill protected birds by wind Turbines.  Stuff from the NYT, Wa Post, Fox, a bunch of scientific groups, more. The permits were extended by the Obama Admin in 2016 for 30 years. 

    By by the way, all wild birds and their nests are protected by Federal and State laws. You have to have the proper license to kill, harm, molest, or bother them. That’s easy to verify, also, just in case you don’t believe me. 
  • pottydocpottydoc Posts: 5,643 Admiral
    pottydoc said:
    How many is that?
    According to Audubon, between 140,000-380,000 a year. That’s just the protected ones like condors, Golden eagles, and bald eagles. 
    According to Audubon...Seeing how their own annual counts and reports to the US F&W Service estimate that there are a total of 463 Condors, 70,000 Bald Eagles and 39,000 golden Eagles in the lower 48, I highly doubt that 140,000 to 300,000 are killed by turbines each year.  I hunt under turbines in Western Wyoming.  I see no increase in dead birds from before the windmills existed to now and I don't see many dead birds at all.
    Like I told Tarp, the number are easily verified by a bunch of sources. It’s not just bald eagles, condors and Golden’s. If you don’t believe that a pile of birds get killed by the windmills, you’re just ignoring facts. Do a search and read it for yourself. 
  • Big BatteryBig Battery Posts: 23,097 AG
    cadman said:
    How much electricity can we afford to keep subsidizing?
    Could you define subsidized? Are tax deductions for certain activities subsidies? Are tax credits for certain activities subsidies? Is it just government handouts? Do we include tax credits to the end user?

    You need to be specific on your definition of a subsidy before anyone can say who gets what for what. 

    I forgot. Are we taking fedaral, state, and local or just federal or some combination?
    https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/06/wind-energy-subsidies-billions/

  • cadmancadman Posts: 43,680 AG
    edited November 2018 #27
    The entire wind energy got $176 billion in subsidies since 2000 and your upset that it is government financed. Your source uses good jobs first subsidy tracker. According to them, intel got $141 billion just by themselves, I guess Intel is a crappy company relying on Government handouts. 

    Alcoa got $150 billion
    Boeing got $73 billion
    GM got $50 billion

    According to the source they used they included federal and state loans that were paid back. My examples above did to. 

    $176 billion for an industry doesn't look like much when Intel and Alcoa got almost as much by themselves using the same criteria. 

    Thanks for the link. 

    BTW, in real subsidies, according to the source in your link, the entire utility and power generation industry got $36 billion in subsidies. 

    https://subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/top-industries

    Aerospace was second and motor vehicles were third. 

    Former Mini Mart Magnate

    I am just here for my amusement. 

  • Team SabatageTeam Sabatage Posts: 13,014 AG
    edited November 2018 #28
    pottydoc said:
    pottydoc said:
    How many is that?
    According to Audubon, between 140,000-380,000 a year. That’s just the protected ones like condors, Golden eagles, and bald eagles. 
    According to Audubon...Seeing how their own annual counts and reports to the US F&W Service estimate that there are a total of 463 Condors, 70,000 Bald Eagles and 39,000 golden Eagles in the lower 48, I highly doubt that 140,000 to 300,000 are killed by turbines each year.  I hunt under turbines in Western Wyoming.  I see no increase in dead birds from before the windmills existed to now and I don't see many dead birds at all.
    Like I told Tarp, the number are easily verified by a bunch of sources. It’s not just bald eagles, condors and Golden’s. If you don’t believe that a pile of birds get killed by the windmills, you’re just ignoring facts. Do a search and read it for yourself. 
    Come hunt with me and you can also search for yourself. that's a fact.  There is one particular Golden that is a pretty reliable sighting for the past 3 years, not dead yet.  Probably learned how to hunt around them.
    I find it interesting that the whole conversation is now revolving around possible bird strikes instead of the whole 20 year decommission as in the headline.  Like I stated, we have Nuclear plants that didn't make it 3 years after their 20 year rebuild.  Where is the outrage?
    Strap me in, tie me down and roll me a bone, I'm getting on an airplane and I'm flying home...
  • TarponatorTarponator Posts: 19,981 AG
    The outrage is among those who see "green energy" and a downside (like having to replace something after 20 years) and don't really think.
  • TarponatorTarponator Posts: 19,981 AG
    pottydoc said:
    Like I told Tarp, the number are easily verified by a bunch of sources. It’s not just bald eagles, condors and Golden’s.
    Had you said that the first or the second time, I would have simply agreed with you and moved on.  Regardless, thanks for pointing that out.
  • treemanjohntreemanjohn Posts: 7,998 Admiral
    Can we all just agree that they're a huge waste of money, unsustainable, and a terrible idea even though it's a feel good for some?
    We’re like the piggy bank that everybody is robbing, and that ends
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Digital Now Included!

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

Preview This Month's Issue

Buy Digital Single Issues

Don't miss an issue.
Buy single digital issue for your phone or tablet.

Buy Single Digital Issue on the Florida Sportsman App

Other Magazines

See All Other Magazines

Special Interest Magazines

See All Special Interest Magazines

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Florida Sportsman stories delivered right to your inbox.

Advertisement

Phone Icon

Get Digital Access.

All Florida Sportsman subscribers now have digital access to their magazine content. This means you have the option to read your magazine on most popular phones and tablets.

To get started, click the link below to visit mymagnow.com and learn how to access your digital magazine.

Get Digital Access

Not a Subscriber?
Subscribe Now