Skip to main content
Home Conservation Front

Now or Neverglades Sportfishing Day.....Tallahassee April 11th, 2017

13

Replies

  • ANUMBER1ANUMBER1 Posts: 13,229 AG
    Grass and oysters are dead all the way north up to the Cape and that part has been on its way out for many years, blame that on sugar too?
    I am glad to only be a bird hunter with bird dogs...being a shooter or dog handler or whatever other niche exists to separate appears to generate far too much about which to worry.
  • DPrestonDPreston Posts: 153 Officer
    The only thing fishing related about your commentary is the trolling - good luck w that.
  • ANUMBER1ANUMBER1 Posts: 13,229 AG
    Who are your science/engineering staff?
    I am glad to only be a bird hunter with bird dogs...being a shooter or dog handler or whatever other niche exists to separate appears to generate far too much about which to worry.
  • duckmanJRduckmanJR Posts: 21,265 AG
    Wow...a 7 pager!

    So, after reading all that...38 Ron seems to have the upper hand in both knowledge and in ability to construct a positive argument for * Finishing projects* rather than just purchasing more land.
    Lots of emotion...which generates heat...but no light.

    PS...The Indian River lagoon is in a state of collapse....Bullsugar's plans won't do jack **** to fix that....should we divert funds from fixing *that* Estuary of national importance so that we can buy some land?
    There are many roads to travel
    Many things to do.
    Knots to be unraveled
    'fore the darkness falls on you
  • DPrestonDPreston Posts: 153 Officer
    You are certainly entitled to your opinion duckmanJR. We are not scientists, nor do we pay any. We support the plans and science supported by the top scientists in our state. Pretty simple - we do our best to be experts on the experts. Here are a few:

    http://www.floridasportsman.com/2015/08/20/eaa-storage-petition/

    We also support CERP - which was written into law in 2000 with an EAA storage component. What we are trying to accomplish is to expedite that EAA storage component from 2021 (where it is currently slated) to ASAP/now due to the urgency of the issue, and the fact that once the US Sugar option expires in 2020, the state will have no leverage. Also pretty simple.
  • Pucker FactorPucker Factor Posts: 875 Officer
    Ron and A#1 . . . well done, but they will not listen to reason, your years of studying this issue and being directly involved like I have been since 2000 as a direct contractor assisting the USACE with developing performance measures for such places as the Florida Bay all the way through to today. Take your time and educate your elected officials so that we do not repeat history and so we can right this ship, get it back on course and build the projects.
  • DPrestonDPreston Posts: 153 Officer
    And by the way duckman, EAA storage has the dual effect of BOTH mitigating the toxic discharges and re-hydrating the Everglades -every drop of water that is sent south is water that is not sent east or west. So your claim that somehow by trying to expedite water storage south of Lake O we are allowing the discharges to the IRL and Chattahoochee to continue could not be more false.
  • DPreston wrote: »
    And by the way duckman, EAA storage has the dual effect of BOTH mitigating the toxic discharges and re-hydrating the Everglades -every drop of water that is sent south is water that is not sent east or west. So your claim that somehow by trying to expedite water storage south of Lake O we are allowing the discharges to the IRL and Chattahoochee to continue could not be more false.

    Have we been paying attention here? We have an EAA reservoir and the environmentalists stopped it. No need to buy anything, just put the money to work to finish what we started.

    When we have a world where Scientists and Engineers plan and build the fix for our past mistakes, why do we need "activists" to forget the facts and try to start all over again.

    Careful what you wish for, maybe it is best that you get what you are asking for and find out it goes nowhere fast!

    The existing EAA reservoir could up and running in 5 years. The new one, I bet most of us here are long dead and gone before you see the first drop of water in it. Oh and by then some other magazine will come along and decide something else should be done!

    I just can't stand top see people who don't really know what they are talking about, trying to change what they know very little about.

    Oh and the greatest fact here is nothing planned here or anything planned before could stop the discharges with the kind of rain we had last year in the dry season.
  • Skunk ApeSkunk Ape Posts: 3,860 Captain
    You just got owned quacky
  • ANUMBER1ANUMBER1 Posts: 13,229 AG
    one of the misguided Amendment 1 supporters... pay attention to the not restricting development
    lol


    "Sen. David Simmons (R-10) encouraged the Citrus Club and the NAIOP, commercial real-estate associations, to back Amendment 1. He said that Amendment 1’s fund was a good way to fix water issues, rather than by restricting development. He said, “Nitrates are seeping into the aquifer and migrating. The theory that dilution is the solution to pollution isn't working. We don't want to be drinking out of the toilet, and that's what we're doing right now. We want to be drinking pristine, pure water… It behooves you to resolve this.”


    Dpreston is a commercial real estate developer..
    I am glad to only be a bird hunter with bird dogs...being a shooter or dog handler or whatever other niche exists to separate appears to generate far too much about which to worry.
  • ANUMBER1ANUMBER1 Posts: 13,229 AG
    BTW, I'm not against development, change is constant and how one deals with their property is pretty much their business..

    I just don't like to see taxpayer money wasted on feel good/look at me I'm awesome measures that don't accomplish squat.
    I also don't like people like you DP that have no problem putting good folks out of a job just so you can play (or profit off their loss).
    That's what you and your ilk are all about.

    JMO.
    I am glad to only be a bird hunter with bird dogs...being a shooter or dog handler or whatever other niche exists to separate appears to generate far too much about which to worry.
  • DarcyDarcy Posts: 1,711 Captain
    ANUMBER1 wrote: »
    BTW, I'm not against development, change is constant and how one deals with their property is pretty much their business..

    I just don't like to see taxpayer money wasted on feel good/look at me I'm awesome measures that don't accomplish squat.
    I also don't like people like you DP that have no problem putting good folks out of a job just so you can play (or profit off their loss).
    That's what you and your ilk are all about.

    JMO.
    Is this just a another anti bullsugar rant. Really. You know they are not the only groups advocating for the southern dynamic reservoir. Actually there are many.
    What say you folks, about these guys. Opinions. Are they just more activists.
    https://captainsforcleanwater.org/official-statement/
    I think not kind sir.
    Here's a few pics of the work they are doing.




    Educating the older folks, the younger guys and girls.
    They also educate the next generation in schools.

    Your constant anti bullsugar drivel is getting old.

    As well as many companies directly and indirectly affected by the current water mismanagement, who support this.
    Eg.






    And just FYI. Their are two other logos in the Picture in O.P. Besides bullsugar supporting this event
    "No i'm NOT Darcizzle!":blowkiss


    https://captainsforcleanwater.org
  • DPrestonDPreston Posts: 153 Officer
    Actually I am a commercial real estate broker. I work with retailers and restauranteurs locate spaces for new locations and help negotiate their leases. Not sure why that is relevant to this conversation but now that that's cleared up, flattered that you are so interested in my personal life.
  • Darcy, being "for" something does not guarantee you understand what it is and what has been done!

    Of course boat captains are for clean water, of course fisherman are for clean water, heck everyone is for clean water.

    But filling a room with boat captains does not compare to the scientific information in support of one plan or another.

    Quote just one thing I have said that is not true!

    Buy the land but I can assure you it Will BE LEASED BACK TO BIG SUGAR!

    Build the existing EAA first! Its the quickest path to some relief.

    Oh and as I said, nothing that can be done will stop the discharges to the St Lucie in a rain event like we had last year!
    Only thing you could do is bulldoze Orlando and make IT a reservoir!

    A comprehensive plan to clean water includes control of developments, replacement of septic tanks, an end to land farming sewage sludge, control on fertilizers, restoration of rivers and lakes and wetlands, and numerous other actions.

    A one stop cure is not possible and the new EAA will just be another project we cant start or finish due to lakc of funds.

    Heck, how about a $500 surcharge on fishing and boating registrations? That would be a good start, how would the captains like that?
  • duckmanJRduckmanJR Posts: 21,265 AG
    DPreston wrote: »
    And by the way duckman, EAA storage has the dual effect of BOTH mitigating the toxic discharges and re-hydrating the Everglades -every drop of water that is sent south is water that is not sent east or west. So your claim that somehow by trying to expedite water storage south of Lake O we are allowing the discharges to the IRL and Chattahoochee to continue could not be more false.

    You must have problems with reading comprehension...or are being obtuse...no matter though..

    I * did not * say anything about sending water south allows damage to the IRL.*
    I said it will *do nothing to effect the health* for the IRL except for that tiny portion in the immediate area of the St Lucie confluence...since the lake water goes out the inlet for the most part with a small area of impact . It will not do anything for the 43,000 acres of seagrasses lost from the system from Ft. Pierce north.

    and... the Chattahoochee river is not even in this part of the state....but I can see where your emotions got you so worked up...you mistook Caloosahatchee....
    There are many roads to travel
    Many things to do.
    Knots to be unraveled
    'fore the darkness falls on you
  • duckmanJRduckmanJR Posts: 21,265 AG
    Darcy, being "for" something does not guarantee you understand what it is and what has been done!

    Of course boat captains are for clean water, of course fisherman are for clean water, heck everyone is for clean water.

    But filling a room with boat captains does not compare to the scientific information in support of one plan or another.

    Quote just one thing I have said that is not true!

    Buy the land but I can assure you it Will BE LEASED BACK TO BIG SUGAR!

    Build the existing EAA first! Its the quickest path to some relief.

    Oh and as I said, nothing that can be done will stop the discharges to the St Lucie in a rain event like we had last year!
    Only thing you could do is bulldoze Orlando and make IT a reservoir!

    A comprehensive plan to clean water includes control of developments, replacement of septic tanks, an end to land farming sewage sludge, control on fertilizers, restoration of rivers and lakes and wetlands, and numerous other actions.

    A one stop cure is not possible and the new EAA will just be another project we cant start or finish due to lakc of funds.

    Heck, how about a $500 surcharge on fishing and boating registrations? That would be a good start, how would the captains like that?

    Ron, It is obvious to anyone who has spent time learning about what is really being done... not enough
    and has been done...and will be done.... ( lease back :wink )
    that it is easy to get sheep to be herded if the flock is frightened.
    It is funny in an ironic way...that if you don't "buy in" on what bullsugar wants....you are somehow "anti"...like you don't want clean water and vibrant fisheries...laughable...but sad.

    I can only hope common sense prevails...and the projects that are do-able and in the que to get done...get done quickly. When that is done...then maybe they should start working *upstream* where all this polluted water originates...and get working on that. And even with all that KCOL system work....we still have 40-50 years of legacy pollutants to deal with....

    I only wish that so many didn't think there were "magic bullets" to fix what it took decades to do...
    There are many roads to travel
    Many things to do.
    Knots to be unraveled
    'fore the darkness falls on you
  • toomertoomer Posts: 348 Deckhand
    This discussion is extremely valuable and I want to thank all sides. This is what forums are all about and this one in particular is populated with knowledgable and passionate folks.

    But many threads on the Confron have hashed all this out before. The battle has been waged since the early 60's or before.

    Here are some givens that shape my thinking and must be factored in: 1) Florida's population and its water needs have long passed the tipping point for sustainability. 2) Meteorological extremes are cyclical here and the hydrology will always be out of kilter. 3) This has been studied to death and because of one and two above is essentially unfixable beyond bandaids and tourniquets. 4) And in case you haven't noticed, we as a country are so far in debt that we can do little more with the plans we have already developed.

    Now to me, we need to do the doable as quickly as possible and not let perfect get in the way what we can do now. I would hate to see Bullsugar's efforts move what's in the pipeline aside. I doubt they want that either.
  • pottydocpottydoc Posts: 5,768 Admiral
    toomer, actually, they do want to by pass what's already underway, and planned. They are bull headed that only sending water south will work. It's their manta, and they just keep on repeating it, and vilifying anyone who doesn't support them 100%. They support Negron's plan because it will buy sugar land. The fact that they have zero plan on cleaning up the water dumped into their storage area is not even discussed. They won't listen to people like Ron who are professionals involved in water management everyday. And then you got people like Darcy, who think just because company's that market outdoor products sign up as supporting them actually means something beyond a bunch of advertising. The problems north of the Lake are ignored, the effect of El Niño years are ignored (or falsely claimed to be fixable by building a storage area south of the Lake), as is anything else besides sending water south. Do we need to do that? Heck yes. But not before, or instead of completing projects already approved and funded.
  • Flatwater witchFlatwater witch Posts: 606 Officer
    duckmanJR wrote: »
    I can only hope common sense prevails...and the projects that are do-able get done and get done quickly.



    Very True.
    I do smile when on the Tamiami Trail and see the second bridge under construction...
    Slowly but surely.

    http://www.evergladesfoundation.org/what-we-do/projects/tamiami-trail/
  • lemaymiamilemaymiami Posts: 4,909 Captain
    Speaking of projects... I long to see the "second bridge" across Taylor Slough (roughly 3/4 mile past the entrance to Everglades National Park) actually become functional.... It was built shortly after I came back to guiding (1996 or thereabouts...) and was intended to allow all that "additional freshwater to flow down into Taylor Slough - then down into the area of Florida Bay that is in such sad shape... That bridge hasn't seen one additional drop of water since it was built and is just another monument to great plans/promises that never seemed to get completed....

    For those hearing the carefully worded pitch from Neverglades... think long and hard about just what it takes to actually follow through with planned improvements (from money needed - not diverted, to plans carefully thought out - not sidetracked, to building consensus instead of immediately running to the nearest court to get your way....). The history I've seen since I first got interested in conservation issues (mid to late seventies) hasn't been very encouraging. We've had some major successes - but the hardest job of all with be restoring as much of the water resource as we possibly can... What created and sustained the everglades over thousands of years was water that was almost nutrient free with a yearly cycle of flood and drought. Most of our problems have been self-created and won't easily be fixed - beware the "quick fix" that might just de-rail a lot of good long term progress in other areas...
    Tight Lines
    Bob LeMay
    (954) 435-5666
  • duckmanJRduckmanJR Posts: 21,265 AG
    duckmanJR wrote: »
    I can only hope common sense prevails...and the projects that are do-able get done and get done quickly.



    Very True.
    I do smile when on the Tamiami Trail and see the second bridge under construction...
    Slowly but surely.

    http://www.evergladesfoundation.org/what-we-do/projects/tamiami-trail/

    Yes...again...doing what is do-able....

    Three more to go.....:)
    There are many roads to travel
    Many things to do.
    Knots to be unraveled
    'fore the darkness falls on you
  • Toothy ThangToothy Thang Posts: 1,440 Officer
    pottydoc wrote: »
    then you got people like Darcy, who think just because company's that market outdoor products sign up as supporting them actually means something beyond a bunch of advertising.


    Initially reading that I smirked a bit... glad you pointed that out.

    The sad part is it looks favorable to the masses on social media.
  • ANUMBER1ANUMBER1 Posts: 13,229 AG
    duckmanJR wrote: »
    I can only hope common sense prevails...and the projects that are do-able get done and get done quickly.



    Very True.
    I do smile when on the Tamiami Trail and see the second bridge under construction...
    Slowly but surely.

    http://www.evergladesfoundation.org/what-we-do/projects/tamiami-trail/
    Yes sir, that is a worthy series of projects that everyone needs to support.
    I am glad to only be a bird hunter with bird dogs...being a shooter or dog handler or whatever other niche exists to separate appears to generate far too much about which to worry.
  • pottydocpottydoc Posts: 5,768 Admiral
    lemaymiami wrote: »
    Speaking of projects... I long to see the "second bridge" across Taylor Slough (roughly 3/4 mile past the entrance to Everglades National Park) actually become functional.... It was built shortly after I came back to guiding (1996 or thereabouts...) and was intended to allow all that "additional freshwater to flow down into Taylor Slough - then down into the area of Florida Bay that is in such sad shape... That bridge hasn't seen one additional drop of water since it was built and is just another monument to great plans/promises that never seemed to get completed....

    For those hearing the carefully worded pitch from Neverglades... think long and hard about just what it takes to actually follow through with planned improvements (from money needed - not diverted, to plans carefully thought out - not sidetracked, to building consensus instead of immediately running to the nearest court to get your way....). The history I've seen since I first got interested in conservation issues (mid to late seventies) hasn't been very encouraging. We've had some major successes - but the hardest job of all with be restoring as much of the water resource as we possibly can... What created and sustained the everglades over thousands of years was water that was almost nutrient free with a yearly cycle of flood and drought. Most of our problems have been self-created and won't easily be fixed - beware the "quick fix" that might just de-rail a lot of good long term progress in other areas...
    Great post, Bob.
  • DPrestonDPreston Posts: 153 Officer
    The real difference of opinion I see here is that some of us are willing to sacrifice the possibility of long term real solutions for fear of losing momentum on shorter term incremental progress. We want both, and are unwilling to lock our state into a perpetual system of mediocrity. Nobody has given me a good answer to how we will be able to send sufficient volumes of water south if we let the final US Sugar option that expires in 2020 lapse. "Stick to the plan" sounds great, but if we did that, EAA storage is slated to begin planning in 2021 - it's part of CERP - how do any of you propose the state acquire that land if we wait? Because clearly, sugar isn't parting with it without a war. Without that option, the state has no leverage. And it's only getting more expensive as the state becomes more populated. What's your solution? Build CERP, a $20B project, without one of its most important components, EAA storage? Basically gut it? Sacrifice the effectiveness of a $20b project to try to save $2.4b? I couldn't think of a bigger waste of $ than NOT buying this land actually.
  • SFWMD present a different scientific opinion that basically stated that the scientists who propose the South reservoir manipulated the data to make the South option look better than it is and the North reservoir option to look less efficient than it is.

    More of the bullshi woops bullsugar guys faking the data.
  • pottydocpottydoc Posts: 5,768 Admiral
    DPreston wrote: »
    The real difference of opinion I see here is that some of us are willing to sacrifice the possibility of long term real solutions for fear of losing momentum on shorter term incremental progress. We want both, and are unwilling to lock our state into a perpetual system of mediocrity. Nobody has given me a good answer to how we will be able to send sufficient volumes of water south if we let the final US Sugar option that expires in 2020 lapse. "Stick to the plan" sounds great, but if we did that, EAA storage is slated to begin planning in 2021 - it's part of CERP - how do any of you propose the state acquire that land if we wait? Because clearly, sugar isn't parting with it without a war. Without that option, the state has no leverage. And it's only getting more expensive as the state becomes more populated. What's your solution? Build CERP, a $20B project, without one of its most important components, EAA storage? Basically gut it? Sacrifice the effectiveness of a $20b project to try to save $2.4b? I couldn't think of a bigger waste of $ than NOT buying this land actually.

    The problem is that buying the sugar land, and building a storage area won't help at all. To send the water on south it needs to be cleaned. As far as I can see, there is nothing in Negrons plan to clean up the water. All it's gonna be is a big lake full of the same nasty water that is in Lake O. If that water gets sent into FL Bay, what kind of damage will it do there? Once it's full, it will stay full, unless water just like what's in Okeechobee gets sent on south. We can do that now, why would we want to spend 2.4B to do what we already can? Like Ron said, more Bullsugar B S.
  • DPrestonDPreston Posts: 153 Officer
    Pottydoc, you have no idea what you are talking about.
  • ANUMBER1ANUMBER1 Posts: 13,229 AG
    Wonder what type of porkchop projects are being added to Negron's bill?
    I am glad to only be a bird hunter with bird dogs...being a shooter or dog handler or whatever other niche exists to separate appears to generate far too much about which to worry.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Digital Now Included!

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

Preview This Month's Issue

Buy Digital Single Issues

Don't miss an issue.
Buy single digital issue for your phone or tablet.

Buy Single Digital Issue on the Florida Sportsman App

Other Magazines

See All Other Magazines

Special Interest Magazines

See All Special Interest Magazines

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Florida Sportsman stories delivered right to your inbox.

Advertisement

Phone Icon

Get Digital Access.

All Florida Sportsman subscribers now have digital access to their magazine content. This means you have the option to read your magazine on most popular phones and tablets.

To get started, click the link below to visit mymagnow.com and learn how to access your digital magazine.

Get Digital Access

Not a Subscriber?
Subscribe Now