FBI Agents----> hILLary is The Anti-Christ!

Gary M

Can it get any worse for her? I hope so..........


FBI Agents: Hillary Is The "Antichrist Personified"

by Tyler Durden
Nov 3, 2016 9:05 PM

Having exposed the mutinous divide between The FBI and The Department of Justice, it appears the drip-drip-drip leaky bucket has turned into a spigot as The Guardian cites several seriously pissed off agents describe the FBI as "Trumplandia."

As The Hill details, in a report published Thursday, multiple sources within the FBI say that deep antipathy toward Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and anger that FBI Director James Comey did not bring charges against her this summer have motivated leaks that could damage her presidential campaign.

One agent told The Guardian that many at the bureau view Clinton as the “antichrist” and are supportive of Trump.

The currently serving FBI agent said Clinton is “the antichrist personified to a large swath of FBI personnel,” and that “the reason why they’re leaking is they’re pro-Trump.”

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-03/fbi-agents-view-hillary-antichrist



“The FBI is Trumpland,” said one current agent.

dragon bait

:Spittingcoffee

cadman

If they are leaking false or misleading information simply for political reasons, as your article IU nsinuates, they need to be fired.

Tarponator

Apparently, there's currently a new investigation going on.....with the FBI investigating itself!

The FBI is investigating itself for alleged pro-Trump tweets

The Federal Bureau of Investigation on Friday announced that it's conducting an internal investigation into a pair of tweets that give off a pro-Donald Trump vibe, just four days before polls open in many states.

A Twitter account managed by the agency's records division sprang to life on Oct. 30 after laying dormant for more than a year, posting 20 tweets within 24 hours. The first tweet that day labeled Trump's father, real estate magnate Fred Trump, as a philanthropist.

One day later, the account linked to documents relating to President Bill Clinton's pardon of Marc Rich.

Under the Hatch Act, the FBI and its employees are forbidden from taking an active role in elections, a charge that's been lobbed at the agency for both this and Director James Comey's vague letter earlier in the week that was widely seen as a re-entry into the Hillary Clinton email server investigation.

These are the tweets in question.

FBI Records Vault
@FBIRecordsVault

William J. Clinton Foundation: This initial release consists of material from the FBI's files related to the Will... https://vault.fbi.gov/william-j.-clinton-foundation …
12:00 AM - 2 Nov 2016

FBI Records [email protected]

Fred C. Trump: Fred C. Trump (1905-1999) was a real estate developer and philanthropist. This release consists of... https://vault.fbi.gov/fred-c.-trump
4:00 PM - 30 Oct 2016


ThinkProgress first reported the internal investigation, which is being handled by the agency's inspection division.

--Eder Campuzano
503.221.4344

You can't make this stuff up....

sjm1582002

FBI agents are not known to have much affinity for known organized crime figures.

Schmidty

cadman wrote: »

If they are leaking false or misleading information simply for political reasons, as your article IU nsinuates, they need to be fired.

I agree...to do otherwise would not be right.

To vote for such a tainted scum as Hillary Clinton would not be right either.

Gary M

cadman wrote: »

If they are leaking false or misleading information simply for political reasons, as your article IU nsinuates, they need to be fired.

How do you know the info is 'false'?

These FBI Agents worked hard for over a year, they SAW all the evidence, they mostly ALL knew that she's guilty, but Hussien tells Lynch who tells Comey to let her skate. How would any of you guys feel, if you were an Agent that had gone through this charade?

Would you be PIZZED?????

Tarponator

The hole in your logic, of course, is that nobody knows who these agents are or if they have even seen the evidence much less "mostly ALL knew that she's guilty".

You wouldn't be making crap up again, would you?

And I think you meant "pissed".

navigator2

cadman wrote: »

If they are leaking false or misleading information simply for political reasons, as your article IU nsinuates, they need to be fired.

Not surprising, and nothing new. Before the original Comey announcement, this was already predicted. "A Mountain of Evidence".

phlatsphil

Gary M wrote: »

Can it get any worse for her? I hope so..........


FBI Agents: Hillary Is The "Antichrist Personified"

Are you trying to imply civil servants aren't allowed to have their own opinions about presidential candidates?

cadman

Gary M wrote: »

How do you know the info is 'false'?

These FBI Agents worked hard for over a year, they SAW all the evidence, they mostly ALL knew that she's guilty, but Hussien tells Lynch who tells Comey to let her skate. How would any of you guys feel, if you were an Agent that had gone through this charade?

Would you be PIZZED?????

I dont, but the article insinuates the only reason they are leaking info is to damage Hillary sine they support Trump.

cpr

Remember when the libs praised leaks and theft like the pentagon papers, whistleblowers and the stand-up AG Elliot Richardson.

cpr

sjm1582002 wrote: »

FBI agents are not known to have much affinity for known organized crime figures.

most anyways

John Joseph Connolly was friends with Whitey Bulger

navigator2

navigator2 wrote: »

Not surprising, and nothing new. Before the original Comey announcement, this was already predicted. "A Mountain of Evidence".

July 1st: NAPOLITANO “If Hillary is NOT Indicted” FBI Agents Who have HAD ENOUGH will “LEAK THE TRUTH”.

He told “Mornings With Maria” host Maria Bartiromo that the damning email was from longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin to Clinton, and those closest to her, informing them that they had been hacked. It also said that they were going to temporarily disable State Department security features to accommodate the then secretary of state.

“That directly defies Mrs. Clinton’s public statements, made on numerous occasions, that she never jeopardized nation security secrets and that she was never hacked,” he said.

It can also pose a problem for Clinton because, at the insistence of U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan, she certified “under penalty of perjury” that she had turned over all government related emails.

Napolitano called the case against Clinton “overwhelming” and said that President Obama, if his Justice Department chooses not to indict her, could face a major scandal.

“If FBI agents resign and leak on the eve of the election or the eve of the DNC, does President Obama have a Watergate-like, Saturday Night Massacre on his hands?” Napolitano asked.

Them chickens were coming home to roost whether Comey announced anything or not.

Parkerboy

cadman wrote: »

I dont, but the article insinuates the only reason they are leaking info is to damage Hillary sine they support Trump.

Have you considered they may support Trump because they saw all the evidence?

cadman

Parkerboy wrote: »

Have you considered they may support Trump because they saw all the evidence?

they can support who they wish, they are not allowed to mettle in the political process by reporting inaccurate information, if that is what they are doing.

I remember when this started last year and we had all these rumors and claims by unnamed sources and none of them were true when it was over.

Parkerboy

So, you are opposed to any law enforcement officers leaking information to the press which may affect a political campaign?

cadman

Parkerboy wrote: »

So, you are opposed to any law enforcement officers leaking information to the press which may affect a political campaign?

I am opposed to leaking fake information.

Just for the record, I doubt most anonymous sources are real.

If an officer wants to say who he is and make a statement, then go for it.

The MelMan

cadman wrote: »

I am opposed to leaking fake information.

.

But of course, Hillary is really worth $500,000 an hour as a speaker..............she's hillarious. Nothing untoward about that ............fake information my azzz.

navigator2

cadman wrote: »

I am opposed to leaking fake information.

Just for the record, I doubt most anonymous sources are real.

If an officer wants to say who he is and make a statement, then go for it.

Not gonna happen. EVERY gubt agency is highly political. All the way down to lowly county and city employees unless they are protected by a civil service union agreement. Nothing that the FBI has said or leaked is untrue about the Beast. The DOJ has made it clear they are not prosecuting. When you catch the Attorney General and the former pres who is married to the Dim front runner on a plane stop days ahead of the FBI's announcement, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the fix was in.

Schmidty

How many times have we heard on the news..."and police sources said..."?

Without that type of info coming out from "sources" there would not be a whole lot of reporting on things like organized crime and the like.

navigator2

Schmidty wrote: »

How many times have we heard on the news..."and police sources said..."?

Without that type of info coming out from "sources" there would not be a whole lot of reporting on things like organized crime and the like.

The Clinton Crime Machine is well known to dispose of it's political enemies. Even the FBI and CIA ain't safe.

The MelMan

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; the press is out in full force supporting Hillary and trashing Comey and the FBI. You said before anyone, that your sources said there was more than the FBI and that intelligence was involved. Can you elaborate on that at all?
PG
ANSWER: I do not really like to reveal too much. I will say this for you can at least follow the breadcrumbs yourself. The reason why “intelligence” is also deeply concerned is that the very countries who Hillary herself has acknowledged fund ISIS are also big donators to the Clinton Foundation. Even Obama doesn’t want 9/11 families suing Saudi Arabia. Julian Assange has now come out and reported that Hillary accepts money at her foundation from the same countries funding ISIS.
The “issue” at stake here is by no means trying to take down Hillary as a candidate just because. The “issue” is there are very deep concerns that Hillary is conflicted and that taking money from the VERY countries who fund ISIS, means she has been compromised and that she would follow Obama trying to overthrow Syria and not fight ISIS. This policy will lead to a continued wave of terrorism and Hillary has been compromised from a national security perspective.
There are “speculative” rumors that Obama has been promised a pay out from the Clintons after he leaves office. This may be total nonsense. But just watch what happens if she gets in.
The seeds are being planted. U.S. Senator Tom Carper, a Democrat on the Senate Homeland Security Committee, has claimed that a letter purporting to be from him is a fake by Russia. The document that has not been made public despite claims it has been, is said to conclude: “Any suspicious incident will be immediately reported to your assistants so that a recount of votes could be timely organized. You will not lose the election because of some compromised electronic voting systems.”