Skip to main content
Home Conservation Front

FWC Red Drum "Survey Says..."

Luv2YakLuv2Yak Posts: 944 Officer
If you’re tired of complaints about FWC reducing the redfish daily bag limit in Florida’s Northwest Red Drum Management Zone then you may well stop reading here.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Attached to this post is FWC’s summary of its 2016 Red Drum Stakeholder Engagement Survey in its entirety. Much of that which is revealed by these survey results directly contradicts FWC’s rationale for lowering the redfish bag limit.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
In my opinion, FWC made a bad decision. “Bad” because, throughout the process, FWC never had/never used any recent scientific data, findings, etc. to support its’ decision. “Bad” because, based on recent personal experience, as well as those of others, conventional wisdom has been saying, “the Red Drum fishery in the NW Management Zone (other than perhaps the Apalachicola Bay) is okay.”

[Note: given the environmental plight of Apalachicola Bay (collapse of the oyster industry as an indicator), it came as no surprise to me that some in that area began expressing concerns about redfish specifically in that area.]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Information as provided by/from FWC:

Total survey respondents 8,311
NW Mgmt. Zone respondents 3,148 (the highest number of all mgmt. zones)
For this survey, the NW Mgmt. Zone was sub-divided as follows:
• Panhandle (Escambia through Ochlockonee Bay in Wakulla) 1,660
• Big Bend (Apalachee Bay in Wakulla through Pasco) 1,488
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -
Where to begin? Perhaps at the end…

“In the past year, stakeholders have expressed concerns that red drum populations have declined in parts of the Panhandle since 2013, the final year of data included in the most recent stock assessment.”
- from FWC news release 9/8/2016

“Which of the following have you noticed in your area in the past two (2) years?”
Survey (Panhandle segment) says,…

• Fewer small red drum 7% Fewer large red drum 8% Fewer red drum 21%
More small red drum 26% More large red drum 30% More red drum 35%
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
“…stakeholders have asked the Commission to modify the management of this fishery.”
- from Memorandum, “Draft Rule – Red Drum”, J. McCawley to FWC Commissioners, 6/23/16

“Commissioner Roberts commented that all of the stakeholders he talked to are in agreement on the reduction in the bag limit.”
- from Minutes, FWC Commission Meeting June 2016 Eastpoint, FL p.14

"all of the stakeholders"? Evidently Commissioner Roberts didn't bother to read the results of FWC's own stakeholder survey:

Survey says…

33% (a minority of 1/3) of Panhandle anglers would support lowering the bag limit in the Panhandle
27% (a minority of slightly more than 1/4) of Big Bend anglers would support lowering the bag limit in the Big Bend
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Also from the Survey:

Big Bend more small red drum 42% more large red drum 18% more red drum 34%

“How do you feel about the status of the red drum fishing in your area over the past year?”

Panhandle: “It’s doing great” 47% “It’s okay” 26% “It’s doing poorly” 11%
Big Bend: “It’s doing great” 46% It’s okay” 29% “It’s doing poorly” 6%
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Guide vs. Recreational Angler

In a separate email communication from FWC 10/17/16 (verification available upon request via PM), here’s a breakdown of respondents to FWC’s 2016 Red Drum Stakeholder Engagement Survey:

• Panhandle: 103 guides/charter captains, 6.2% of 1,660 respondents
• Big Bend: 55 guides/charter captains, 3.8% of 1,448 respondents
• NW Red Drum Management Zone (Panhandle+Big Bend) 158 guides/charter captains, 5.1% of 3,108 respondents.
Guides/charter captains comprised a very low percentage of total survey respondents.


“How do you feel about the status of the red drum fishing in your area over the past year?”
• “It’s doing great”: Panhandle Guides 22% Panhandle Rec Anglers 49% Big Bend Guides 38% Big Bend Rec Anglers 46%
• “It’s okay”: Panhandle Guides 11% Panhandle Rec Anglers 27% Big Bend Guides 15% Big Bend Rec Anglers 30%
• “It’s doing poorly: Panhandle Guides 46% Panhandle Rec Anglers 9% Big Bend Guides 19% Big Bend Rec Anglers 6%

Significant disparities exist between guides/charter captains vs. rec anglers.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY: “The Whole Enchilada”, “The Full Monty”

In the absence of good science and current scientific data, FWC relied exclusively on anecdotal reports, heavily biased toward a small number of guides/charter captains operating in the Apalachicola/Panama City area, when deciding to reduce the daily bag limit of redfish in its NW Management Zone.
A careful review of results from FWC’s 2016 Red Drum Stakeholder Engagement Survey clearly shows FWC gave far more consideration to the 5% single-digit minority survey respondents’ guides/charter captains than to the 90%+ overwhelming majority survey respondents’ recreational anglers.
FWC Commissioners look foolish making such a decision, which reeks of catering to the special interest group of guides/charter captains. FWC Staff (including its’ researchers and scientists) look ashamedly like “puppets” engaged in job preservation and politics rather than sound fisheries management grounded in sound research and results.
«13

Replies

Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Digital Now Included!

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

Preview This Month's Issue

Buy Digital Single Issues

Don't miss an issue.
Buy single digital issue for your phone or tablet.

Buy Single Digital Issue on the Florida Sportsman App

Other Magazines

See All Other Magazines

Special Interest Magazines

See All Special Interest Magazines

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Florida Sportsman stories delivered right to your inbox.

Advertisement

Phone Icon

Get Digital Access.

All Florida Sportsman subscribers now have digital access to their magazine content. This means you have the option to read your magazine on most popular phones and tablets.

To get started, click the link below to visit mymagnow.com and learn how to access your digital magazine.

Get Digital Access

Not a Subscriber?
Subscribe Now