Skip to main content
Home Off Topic

Why all that talent is headed out the door at ESPN

FinfinderFinfinder Posts: 9,999 Admiral
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/why-all-that-talent-is-headed-out-the-door-at-espn/2016/04/27/413faa94-0c8d-11e6-bfa1-4efa856caf2a_story.html


Why all that talent is headed out the door at ESPN










cappy_20130830_62541378229107.jpg?uuid=y_8GXhS9EeOyICyVDH8yYw
Skip Bayless steps away from the “First Take” set during a commercial break in August 2013. Bayless and ESPN announced this week that he is leaving the network. (Christopher Capozziello/For The Washington Post)
By Paul Farhi
April 27 at 4:05 PM
If ESPN were one of the teams ESPN covers, it might describe itself as an organization “in transition,” which is a dainty sports cliche that means the immediate future isn’t as promising as the recent past.
One reason for pessimism: The “Worldwide Leader in Sports” has seen a steady drain of superstar talent over the past 10 months, an exodus that is occurring amid deeper structural changes that are eroding ESPN’s once-unassailable fortress.
On Tuesday, the network lost Skip Bayless, a fulminating, at-times infuriating commentator who has been a star at the network for 12 years, most recently on a daytime chatfest called “First Take” that airs on ESPN2. Bayless and ESPN announced that he is leaving the network, but neither said where he is going. The betting is that he’s planning to join Fox-owned FS1, ESPN’s up-and-coming but still-distant rival, reportedly with an eye-popping contract in excess of $5 million.
Bayless’s departure came just two days after ESPN lost Mike Tirico, the veteran play-by-play announcer who was the voice of “Monday Night Football,” ESPN’s signature franchise. Tirico will join NBC, where he is the heir apparent to Al Michaels on “Sunday Night Football” and to Bob Costas as the studio host of the network’s Olympics broadcasts.
Since last year, ESPN has ended its relationship with other high-profile personalities, including Keith Olbermann,Jason Whitlock, Bill Simmons and Colin Cowherd.

URL="https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/skip-bayless-espn2-first-take-co-host-may-be-the-most-hated-man-in-sports/2013/09/13/c001a7c2-170a-11e3-804b-d3a1a3a18f2c_story.html"]Skip Bayless: the most hated man in sports[/URL
If this were the New York Yankees — and ESPN is to sports broadcasting what the Yankees are to baseball — fans would wonder if this dynasty was in trouble.
People at the Disney-owned company caution against declaring any trends. They say the circumstances surrounding each of the recent departees varies. On one hand, ESPN was outbid by rivals for Bayless, Tirico and Cowherd; on the other, it chose to walk away from Olbermann, Whitlock and Simmons, whose programs were either poorly rated (Olbermann) or with whom ESPN’s management clashed (Simmons and Whitlock). In yet another variation on the theme, ESPN commentator Curt Schilling, a former major league pitcher, was fired last week for a series of offensive *social-media posts.
“Over the past 12 months alone, we have signed or re-signed nearly 200 of the more than 1,000 . . . commentators ESPN employs,” ESPN spokesman Josh Krulewitz said in an email. “The notion that ‘everyone is leaving’ is a superficial narrative. Change is inevitable, and strengthened by our unmatched depth, we continue to navigate it very well.”
URL="https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/why-do-so-many-espn-personalities-get-suspended/2015/04/17/aa9beb70-e483-11e4-905f-cc896d379a32_story.html"]Why do so many ESPN personalities get suspended?[/URL
Yet ESPN’s problems go deeper than the loss of a few hosts and talking heads. After years of raking in gargantuan profits, its lucrative empire is threatened by upheaval in the media and technology businesses.

The most obvious disruption is cord-cutting, the movement of TV viewers away from cable subscriptions, most notably to Internet streaming services such as Netflix and Hulu. ESPN, founded in 1979, has been disproportionately affected by the trend; last fall, it surprised the TV industry by revealing that it has lost 7 million subscribers over the past two years, a sizable chunk of its base of nearly 100 million.
A second whammy is coming from within the cable industry itself. Cable operators have long fumed that ESPN and its multiple clone channels are the most expensive for them to license, a cost that is passed along to subscribers in the form of ever-rising monthly cable bills. They have responded by offering lower-priced tiers of channels — known as “skinny bundles” — that usually don’t include the ESPN suite of networks. This has become an attractive option for some viewers, who don’t want to pay for channels they don’t watch.
While ESPN still has the rights to NFL, NBA, Major League Baseball and college football games, all of the cord-cutting and skinny-bundling has cut into the revenue streams that have long showered ESPN with money.
It has responded by cutting costs. In October, it announced the layoffs of about 300 employees, or about 4 percent of its staff. A few days later, it shuttered Grantland, a literary sports and pop culture website founded by Simmons.
Holding down costs is also why ESPN has drawn the line in bidding to keep its personalities.
In an earlier, richer age, ESPN’s executives simply would have taken out their checkbook to renew the contracts of such personalities as Cowherd, Bayless and Tirico, saidJohn Ourand, who covers the company for SportsBusiness Daily. “If they were a million dollars off on a talent they wanted, I imagine they just bridged that gap” with more money, he said.
But that was then.
Only a few years ago, ESPN’s president, John Skipper, resembled George Steinbrenner, the Yankees’ free-spending former owner, said James Andrew Miller, the co-author of “Those Guys Have All the Fun: Inside the World of ESPN,” a best-selling history of the network.
“He spent a lot of money on people and on product,” Miller said. “He went for longer deals, more expensive deals. But that’s before one of the central equations in ESPN’s financial landscape changed” — namely the big drop in subscribers.
The bottom line now, he said, is that “ESPN has decided that its four initials are more valuable than any particular piece of talent.”

Replies

  • Mister-JrMister-Jr Posts: 30,016 AG
    I watch ESPN for sports, not the announcers, broadcasters, or whatever they are called. Colin Cowherd who?
    Vote for the other candidate
  • NOLE66NOLE66 Posts: 1,630 Officer
    ESPN is taking a beating after paying an insane amount for the SEC network. They are losing money, and not a small amount either. The bundled platform is going the way of the dinosaur as a la carte TV will become the new platform. ESPN knows they can no longer compete and will have to reorganize and limit their offerings.
    Makes me smile big and wide to see that pathetic corporation goING down in flames. Ultra-liberal Disney owns ESPN and has dictated their rhetoric. Schilling is talking and it's not good for ESPN. I don't even need to get into the smear campaign they did on Jameis Winston where they ignored the facts to prop up the imaginary 'war on women' that the liberals like to push. Pretty much a pathetic bunch at ESPN. Good riddance to Tirico and company. That POS never missed an opportunity to trash anyone if he got the chance. And then there's Bruce Jenner receiving their 'courage' award. Just when I thought they couldn't stoop lower.
  • 2amigo2amigo Posts: 8,951 Admiral
    66, you hit the nail on the head with the stupid a*s*s courage award to Jenner
  • mindyabinessmindyabiness Posts: 8,010 Admiral
    Finfinder wrote: »
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/why-all-that-talent-is-headed-out-the-door-at-espn/2016/04/27/413faa94-0c8d-11e6-bfa1-4efa856caf2a_story.html


    Why all that talent is headed out the door at ESPN







    cappy_20130830_62541378229107.jpg?uuid=y_8GXhS9EeOyICyVDH8yYw
    Skip Bayless steps away from the “First Take” set during a commercial break in August 2013. Bayless and ESPN announced this week that he is leaving the network. (Christopher Capozziello/For The Washington Post)
    By Paul Farhi
    April 27 at 4:05 PM
    If ESPN were one of the teams ESPN covers, it might describe itself as an organization “in transition,” which is a dainty sports cliche that means the immediate future isn’t as promising as the recent past.
    One reason for pessimism: The “Worldwide Leader in Sports” has seen a steady drain of superstar talent over the past 10 months, an exodus that is occurring amid deeper structural changes that are eroding ESPN’s once-unassailable fortress.
    On Tuesday, the network lost Skip Bayless, a fulminating, at-times infuriating commentator who has been a star at the network for 12 years, most recently on a daytime chatfest called “First Take” that airs on ESPN2. Bayless and ESPN announced that he is leaving the network, but neither said where he is going. The betting is that he’s planning to join Fox-owned FS1, ESPN’s up-and-coming but still-distant rival, reportedly with an eye-popping contract in excess of $5 million.
    Bayless’s departure came just two days after ESPN lost Mike Tirico, the veteran play-by-play announcer who was the voice of “Monday Night Football,” ESPN’s signature franchise. Tirico will join NBC, where he is the heir apparent to Al Michaels on “Sunday Night Football” and to Bob Costas as the studio host of the network’s Olympics broadcasts.
    Since last year, ESPN has ended its relationship with other high-profile personalities, including Keith Olbermann,Jason Whitlock, Bill Simmons and Colin Cowherd.

    URL="https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/skip-bayless-espn2-first-take-co-host-may-be-the-most-hated-man-in-sports/2013/09/13/c001a7c2-170a-11e3-804b-d3a1a3a18f2c_story.html"]Skip Bayless: the most hated man in sports[/URL
    If this were the New York Yankees — and ESPN is to sports broadcasting what the Yankees are to baseball — fans would wonder if this dynasty was in trouble.
    People at the Disney-owned company caution against declaring any trends. They say the circumstances surrounding each of the recent departees varies. On one hand, ESPN was outbid by rivals for Bayless, Tirico and Cowherd; on the other, it chose to walk away from Olbermann, Whitlock and Simmons, whose programs were either poorly rated (Olbermann) or with whom ESPN’s management clashed (Simmons and Whitlock). In yet another variation on the theme, ESPN commentator Curt Schilling, a former major league pitcher, was fired last week for a series of offensive *social-media posts.
    “Over the past 12 months alone, we have signed or re-signed nearly 200 of the more than 1,000 . . . commentators ESPN employs,” ESPN spokesman Josh Krulewitz said in an email. “The notion that ‘everyone is leaving’ is a superficial narrative. Change is inevitable, and strengthened by our unmatched depth, we continue to navigate it very well.”
    URL="https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/why-do-so-many-espn-personalities-get-suspended/2015/04/17/aa9beb70-e483-11e4-905f-cc896d379a32_story.html"]Why do so many ESPN personalities get suspended?[/URL
    Yet ESPN’s problems go deeper than the loss of a few hosts and talking heads. After years of raking in gargantuan profits, its lucrative empire is threatened by upheaval in the media and technology businesses.

    The most obvious disruption is cord-cutting, the movement of TV viewers away from cable subscriptions, most notably to Internet streaming services such as Netflix and Hulu. ESPN, founded in 1979, has been disproportionately affected by the trend; last fall, it surprised the TV industry by revealing that it has lost 7 million subscribers over the past two years, a sizable chunk of its base of nearly 100 million.
    A second whammy is coming from within the cable industry itself. Cable operators have long fumed that ESPN and its multiple clone channels are the most expensive for them to license, a cost that is passed along to subscribers in the form of ever-rising monthly cable bills. They have responded by offering lower-priced tiers of channels — known as “skinny bundles” — that usually don’t include the ESPN suite of networks. This has become an attractive option for some viewers, who don’t want to pay for channels they don’t watch.
    While ESPN still has the rights to NFL, NBA, Major League Baseball and college football games, all of the cord-cutting and skinny-bundling has cut into the revenue streams that have long showered ESPN with money.
    It has responded by cutting costs. In October, it announced the layoffs of about 300 employees, or about 4 percent of its staff. A few days later, it shuttered Grantland, a literary sports and pop culture website founded by Simmons.
    Holding down costs is also why ESPN has drawn the line in bidding to keep its personalities.
    In an earlier, richer age, ESPN’s executives simply would have taken out their checkbook to renew the contracts of such personalities as Cowherd, Bayless and Tirico, saidJohn Ourand, who covers the company for SportsBusiness Daily. “If they were a million dollars off on a talent they wanted, I imagine they just bridged that gap” with more money, he said.
    But that was then.
    Only a few years ago, ESPN’s president, John Skipper, resembled George Steinbrenner, the Yankees’ free-spending former owner, said James Andrew Miller, the co-author of “Those Guys Have All the Fun: Inside the World of ESPN,” a best-selling history of the network.
    “He spent a lot of money on people and on product,” Miller said. “He went for longer deals, more expensive deals. But that’s before one of the central equations in ESPN’s financial landscape changed” — namely the big drop in subscribers.
    The bottom line now, he said, is that “ESPN has decided that its four initials are more valuable than any particular piece of talent.”

    Good post
    Made it a little easier to read
    Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon... No matter how good you are, the bird is going to crap on the board and strut around like it won anyway.
    I AM NOT A RACIST
  • ScoutboatScoutboat Posts: 2,575 Captain
    Mister-Jr wrote: »
    I watch ESPN for sports, not the announcers, broadcasters, or whatever they are called. Colin Cowherd who?

    The Hulk named Colin "Colin Cowhead".
    A lady in Alabama called him Colin Cowturd
    :rotflmao
  • Cane PoleCane Pole Posts: 10,030 AG
    ESPN is as good as ever.

    Somebody has to whine about everything these days
    Live music 7 nights a week: http://www.terrafermata.com/_events
  • GRSCGRSC Posts: 942 Officer
    I think SportsCenter sucks... more like a daytime talkshow platform - spare me the latest Instagram posts from Gronk and tell me a score with some highlights.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ZimmerNoleZimmerNole Posts: 9,243 Admiral
    GRSC wrote: »
    I think SportsCenter sucks... more like a daytime talkshow platform - spare me the latest Instagram posts from Gronk and tell me a score with some highlights.

    I agree.

    Sportscenter has been relegated to the "before bed" type of TV, and no longer a source for sports news, it's all Espentertainment.
    Heroes On the Water
    South Florida Chapter Coordinator
    https://www.facebook.com/HOWSouthFloridaChapter

    "Helping find peace for those who fought to defend it!" :USA
    FREEDOM CAPTURED!

    FSU Alumni GO NOLES!!! >>
    >

    2013 Hobie Outback
  • sailfish2sailfish2 Posts: 4,321 Captain
    ESPN sucks these days. I do not need woman and gays telling me all about manly sports. I also do not need to hear about so much soccer, badminton and other fringe sports I care nothing for.

    I guess this is what happens when you have a rainbow mouse running things.
    Hoping for better luck next time...... and got it.

    WINNING!
  • FinfinderFinfinder Posts: 9,999 Admiral
    don't tune into ESP if you want anything on Hockey they didn't get the contract so they bailed on the NHL and hardly report on it anymore but they did add the WWE
  • ifitswimsifitswims Posts: 176 Deckhand
    To many other choices , ESPN and Target are long gone.
  • navigator2navigator2 Posts: 22,521 AG
    ZimmerNole wrote: »
    I agree.

    Sportscenter has been relegated to the "before bed" type of TV, and no longer a source for sports news, it's all Espentertainment.

    The network formerly known as the best in sports, then relegated to ESPIN, now is a sucking egg. They don't even have decent commentators during football season, I've seen first hand where moss growing on a rock has more technical knowledge or insight to a game in progress. I still remember watching a Gator game when some **** from volleyball wars was commenting on yet another errant Treon pass was intercepted deep into enemy territory, effectively an excellent punt. It was 4th down and a mile and running for his life..........and she says.........and I am not making this up...........sometimes you just have to know when to throw away a pass. :Spittingcoffee
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • FinfinderFinfinder Posts: 9,999 Admiral
    too bad for you guys ESPN owns the SEC now
  • Salty GatorSalty Gator Posts: 1,831 Captain
    NOLE66 wrote: »
    ESPN is taking a beating after paying an insane amount for the SEC network.

    ESPN is indeed weak these days but thinking the Disney execs know anything about the programing is fantasy.
  • fishdishfishdish Posts: 1,223 Officer
    I agree with the decline of ESPN. It's too gimmicky anymore and I think they are too focused on the brand and marketing these days. What made them good was enthusiastic sports geeks talking about sports. They lost me when they started putting animations in some of the highlights. The anchors these days are retreads that are coming off as Prius driving, IPA drinking Hipsters…. No thanks...
  • Cane PoleCane Pole Posts: 10,030 AG
    Ray Lewis and Cris Carter supposedly got the boot today.

    Too bad, I liked them.
    Live music 7 nights a week: http://www.terrafermata.com/_events
  • JKPJKP Posts: 3,211 Captain
    Cane Pole wrote: »
    Ray Lewis and Cris Carter supposedly got the boot today.

    Too bad, I liked them.


    Opposite for me. Good riddance.
  • FinfinderFinfinder Posts: 9,999 Admiral

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/culture/bruce-bookter/2016/05/05/espn-hires-politically-active-leftistlgbt-activist-because


    Not a Shock: ESPN Hires Left-Wing, Hillary-Supporting Analyst

    In what might go down as the most redundant and superfluous hire in the history of redundant and superfluous hires, a network already dominated and run by leftist, LGBT activists hired…wait for it…a leftist, LGBT activist.
    The network doing the hiring, in this case, was ESPN. The hired activist is former U.S. women’s soccer gold medalist, and World Cup champion Abby Wambach.
    According to the Washington Post:


    I’m going to go out on a limb here and guess that Wambach’s “fearless conviction” will not be that gender is not a choice, and that bathrooms made for women should only be used by women. Of course, that was the fearless conviction that got Curt Schilling tossed out the door.
    In fact, Wambach’s radically pro-LGBT convictions do not require her to be fearless. Because her convictions are already held by the PC overseers at the “four-letter network.” Which makes one wonder why ESPN even made the move to hire Wambach in the first place? Considering they could get precisely her same opinion from any one of their current staff.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Digital Now Included!

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

Preview This Month's Issue

Buy Digital Single Issues

Don't miss an issue.
Buy single digital issue for your phone or tablet.

Buy Single Digital Issue on the Florida Sportsman App

Other Magazines

See All Other Magazines

Special Interest Magazines

See All Special Interest Magazines

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Florida Sportsman stories delivered right to your inbox.

Advertisement

Phone Icon

Get Digital Access.

All Florida Sportsman subscribers now have digital access to their magazine content. This means you have the option to read your magazine on most popular phones and tablets.

To get started, click the link below to visit mymagnow.com and learn how to access your digital magazine.

Get Digital Access

Not a Subscriber?
Subscribe Now