2015 Coaches Poll Released (don't click, Zimm)

Buckeye

fins4me wrote: »

Just shedding some light on the sad reality of teams who manufacture trivial non significant schedules.

As if it wasn't known already.

You'll be happy to know that the Big Ten is joining the ACC and SEC in dropping FCS teams and going to 9 conference and 1 power 5 non conference games in 2016 and beyond.

The scheduling guidelines set the Big Ten apart from its Power Five peers. The Big 12 Conference and Pac-12 also play nine league games; among the three, the Big Ten and Pac-12 each hold a conference championship game. No other league, however, will mandate at least one Power Five opponent and the elimination of FCS foes from its schedules.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/bigten/2015/07/31/big-ten-schedule-nine-league-games-no-fcs-teams-2016/30938987/

Scratch that, I guess no other conference is willing to step up like the Big Ten.

Cane Pole

I have not been reading anything out there....but...Baylor?!?!? ****!!!

fins4me

Buckeye wrote: »

As if it wasn't known already.

You'll be happy to know that the Big Ten is joining the ACC and SEC in dropping FCS teams and going to 9 conference and 1 power 5 non conference games in 2016 and beyond.

The scheduling guidelines set the Big Ten apart from its Power Five peers. The Big 12 Conference and Pac-12 also play nine league games; among the three, the Big Ten and Pac-12 each hold a conference championship game. No other league, however, will mandate at least one Power Five opponent and the elimination of FCS foes from its schedules.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/bigten/2015/07/31/big-ten-schedule-nine-league-games-no-fcs-teams-2016/30938987/

Scratch that, I guess no other conference is willing to step up like the Big Ten.

Considering your teams scheduling tendencies,, I cannot believe you are even commenting.

on_the_rocks

Cane Pole wrote: »

I have not been reading anything out there....but...Baylor?!?!? ****!!!

Did you watch any games last year?
They are all back and nothing is better than the chip that is on their shoulder.

Buckeye

fins4me wrote: »

Considering your teams scheduling tendencies,, I cannot believe you are even commenting.

Fins, we are in the drivers seat.



Best of luck running the SECSECSEC gauntlet again this year.

sailfish2

****, Canes got mentioned. I sure do hope we see significant improvement this year. Been too **** long!

navigator2

fins4me wrote: »

Other than MAYBE Vanderbilt,,,, every team in the SEC would have a better chance of running the table with this pathetic and cowardly schedule than the school it belongs to. There are at most 2 teams of substance on it.

Va Tech (7-6)
Hawaii (4-9 WAC)
N. Illinois (11-3 MAC)
Western Michigan (8-5 MAC)
Indiana (4-8)
Maryland (7-6)
Penn State (7-6)
Rutgers (8-5)
Minnesota (8-5)
Illinois (6-7)
Mich State (11-2)
Michigan (5-7)

And you wonder why Urban left UF? :grin

ZimmerNole

SECSECSEC

Buckeye

Buckeye wrote: »

https://www.sportsbook.ag/sbk/sportsbook4/ncaa-football-betting/ncaa-games-of-the-year.sbk

:huh

Zimm your thoughts on this?

Post #43. FSU only 1.5 point favorites over UF right now.

ZimmerNole

I'd be all over that

Howbigwazthat

on_the_rocks wrote: »

Maybe they only polled SEC coaches.
:rotflmao

8 SEC teams in the top 25.

Son that's what happens when you are the best **** conference in the land.

Cane Pole

on_the_rocks wrote: »

Baylor is my pick to win it all this year.

Buckeye...

Friendly bet that Baylor has a higher AP ranking at the end of the year than tOSU.
5 to 1 on 50$
What say you?

OK

Cane Pole

Cane Pole wrote: »

I have not been reading anything out there....but...Baylor?!?!? ****!!!

BOOM!

on_the_rocks

Lol.
"booming" yourself?

tFFF has name for that but I don't feel like being banned twice on one week.

Cane Pole

you be weird

ZimmerNole

Dupe,

Getti banned over there? For what? LOL

on_the_rocks

ZimmerNole wrote: »

Dupe,

Getti banned over there? For what? LOL

No, never.
I was banned here last week for calling a spade a spade.
I was talking about being banned here again if I called CP what people who "boom" their own quotes are called.