theglide96 wrote: »
Too bad only one person has addressed the issue of proper fish handling! He was cradling that snooky belly so nicely...he deserves props for that, no?
theglide96 wrote: »
Why, every time a perceived fish injustice has taken place and been documented here do forum members feel obligated to hint that the FWC monitors the forums and will come knocking at your door!?? That is complete nonsense!!!!
a) the FS Forum does not have my address or phone number or even my only email address
b) I am assuming the FWC budget does not include facial recognition technology
duckmanJR wrote: »
A photo here is documentation....and cases have been made on forums and facebook / instagram / myspace / snapchat et al...
Thank God for the stupidity to post your stupid stuff to the net!
You don't really think that you can be on the WWW and be untrackable do you?...Really? ... do you think FS or anyone else won't give up your ISP in a second? :rotflmao
FreeLiner wrote: »
For really. It being dead, in your posession, with intent to take it home. Thats illegal. It being dead and oversized, not illegal.
That picture doesnt show intent. It does document a nice catch though.
And for reference. I saw a guy at the Boynton inlet reel in half of what could have been a 40+ inch snook. Shark cut it clean in half. He took a photo with the other half. Obviously it was dead. Is that illegal?
Westwall01 wrote: »
Freeliner, to clarify things and to save you trouble in the future.....an oversized, deceased Snook in your possession is all the "intent" that's needed. The law states - possession, not intent.
theglide96 wrote: »
BD27 wrote: »
I disagree 100 % .
From what I read in JettyPark posts is a concern for the fishery as well as a concern for anglers safety . I have also read posts from him that were detailed giving helpful information to members that have posted questions . IMO when he does get on someone , they usually deserved it ! IMO he is more helpful than harmful and I do not know him personally
Schmidty wrote: »
Now go to the first post's picture and tell me ...."Why aren't his pants wet?"
Can you go "into the water" ....for "15 minutes".....and not get wet pants?....I know I can't.
And he might be telling the truth that "he" doesn't eat seafood......but Good God Almighty......his buddy sure does look hungry....:rotflmao
So think about it all of you "would be "**** Tracy's"....and then let's forget about it....
AquaRooster wrote: »
Agreed. Jettypark is one of the greatest on here. King of kings. He lives to slam some poor kid like myself that are too stupid op.
Jettypark wrote: »
> fix it for you.....
I guess you left your tampon on too long again :blowkiss psssssssss and quit following me around>> :grin
if you knew how to READ you wouldn't be so stupid with those replies of yours... again READ what he wrote..
and I only point things out when stupid people come here/post something stupid and then we are suppose to
take them for their word.. when we point out the dumb chit they did and than they come back and
spin another story on us...:banghead
just like PHOTO> Another bright person that can't read.... I never once said I Physically took a fish away
from somebody.... they gave the fish to me... but only once my LEO friends (that fish with me) pulled out their
badges (Gun was also in plain sight LOL and maybe that help)...but noooooo you would stand your ground and
not give up that over slot snook right??? we'll wait for you **** comment on that one
I guess AquaRooster and his side kick PHOTO.... hate it when others call people out for doing Stupid chit like
keeping over slot snook out of the water too long... or anything else that protects our water...
But you know what they say> People who get upset about things like what I say or do... also tend to do stupid
chit and that's why it bothers them.... I must've hit a nerve... I'm sorry :blowkiss NOT!!!!!!!!!!!