Skip to main content
Home General Hunting

More good news for big ranches

binellishtrbinellishtr Posts: 8,797 Admiral
Pretty soon due to the negligence of the FWS and FWC ranchers will be compensated for natural and non natural predation on their land.

Weather it be a bear,coyote,or flugar WE THE PEOPLE will once again bare the cost of an over populated region of Predators.

I am sympathetic towards landowners who loose calves but it is because of negligence,and GREED amongst the connected agencies that this problem has gotten so out of hand. If nature was left to run its own course,we wouldn't have this problem.

Who owns the deer in FLorida, how do we get compensated for our losses? Should be what's good for the goose is good for the .......

http://news.yahoo.com/ap-exclusive-study-blames-lost-calves-panthers-083303082.html
«134

Replies

  • dew mandew man Posts: 16 Greenhorn
    I think you should become an FWC OFFICER and then you can stop all your *****in and fix the problem.
  • binellishtrbinellishtr Posts: 8,797 Admiral
    officers aren't the problem, it's THEM who are the problem...i got no issues w officers
  • dew mandew man Posts: 16 Greenhorn
    So go become a THEM and be a part of the solution.
  • SWFL HunterSWFL Hunter Posts: 669 Officer
  • Skunk ApeSkunk Ape Posts: 3,860 Captain
    How much is a cow worth, in Gov't dollars?
  • gritsnhuntin1gritsnhuntin1 Posts: 1,181 Officer
    Skunk Ape wrote: »
    How much is a cow worth, in Gov't dollars?

    I'd like to know as well. Prolly twice what's fair.
  • Turner River TerrorTurner River Terror Posts: 11,882 AG
    Can regular Folks sign on with this ?
    Is 5 acres big enough ?
    How much do they pay us for Chickens , Are Ducks more?
    Anybody ever raised a BUNCH of Chickens ?
    How many can I fit on 5 acres ? I can Stake them out with Tent stakes and Shoe laces
    I'm thinkin this could work well...
    Killin and Grillin :grin
  • FLDXTFLDXT Posts: 2,521 Captain
    Where do I sign up?
    Cattle are hiiiiiggggghhhh right now....better sharpen their pencils.
  • FloridaODFloridaOD Posts: 4,471 Captain
    The cost to benefit ratio for the general public is quite agreeable,considering all the other costs the public bears,and the importance of retaining Big Ranch as part of Florida's future landscape,economy and human use,interaction.
    Hunters are present yet relatively uncommon in Florida :wink
  • binellishtrbinellishtr Posts: 8,797 Admiral
    couldn't swallow the BS to be one of THEM...which is why I am self dependant
  • David BDavid B Posts: 1,907 Captain
    "We don't feel as landowners and ranchers that we should have to bear the cost of protecting an endangered species," Priddy said. "It's a public cost that should be shared by everyone."

    I pass the salt and call bullshiat on this one. They **** well knew where they were raising beef when they started doing so. So if the weatherman predicts rain and it doesn't happen, can I be expected to receive relief funds for it. How specifically are they protecting the species? A species that roams. Vultures fly, coyotes, bears and panthers roam. If you live near a swamp, you have snakes. If you live in S. Florida and raise beef, you may have predators. The beef isn't native. I say it's the wrong way around. The FWS, The FWC, DWF and Hug the Panther should be charging these folks for taking away from the native ranges. Place impacts fees on them, large fees. After all it is the cost of business.
    Increasing MMGW or climate change, one twist off at a time.
  • pgarner222pgarner222 Posts: 121 Deckhand
    As far as I'm concerned if it's their land it's their problem. Let them dispatch the problem how they see fit. With the price of cows I can understand why they would be upset. I guess I can see both sides, but business is necessary in our society.
  • Skunk ApeSkunk Ape Posts: 3,860 Captain
    Ranchers should be able to make money letting Yankees shoot panthers on their land.
  • gritsnhuntin1gritsnhuntin1 Posts: 1,181 Officer
    Can regular Folks sign on with this ?
    Is 5 acres big enough ?
    How much do they pay us for Chickens , Are Ducks more?
    Anybody ever raised a BUNCH of Chickens ?
    How many can I fit on 5 acres ? I can Stake them out with Tent stakes and Shoe laces
    I'm thinkin this could work well...

    I'm gonna start a fire ant ranch, and mosquito preserve! where can i sign up for the gubbament cheese?
  • huntsfloridahuntsflorida Posts: 378 Deckhand
    David B wrote: »
    I pass the salt and call bullshiat on this one. They **** well knew where they were raising beef when they started doing so. So if the weatherman predicts rain and it doesn't happen, can I be expected to receive relief funds for it. How specifically are they protecting the species? A species that roams. Vultures fly, coyotes, bears and panthers roam. If you live near a swamp, you have snakes. If you live in S. Florida and raise beef, you may have predators. The beef isn't native. I say it's the wrong way around. The FWS, The FWC, DWF and Hug the Panther should be charging these folks for taking away from the native ranges. Place impacts fees on them, large fees. After all it is the cost of business.

    So you think because the general public (drama queens) wants an overpopulation of these cats that the ranchers cattle should be a food source for them at the ranchers expense? Are you aware of the density of these cats on the Priddy ranch? This property was picked for the study due to the HIGH density of cats located there. It is located next to THE PANTHER REFUGE. These P.O.S's are killing thousands of dollars worth of cattle a year as well as taking a serious toll on our wildlife. It's a B.S. program anyway because of the requirement for a panther biologist must determine it was a panther kill in order for them to be granted funds. It's all another smokescreen to protect to cats. If you think the ranchers are going to collect any serious funds with this program you are mistaken.
    Capt. Mark Clemons
    Everglades Adventures Inc.
    Alligators Inc.
    Alligators International LLC.
    www.huntsflorida.com
    South Florida's Finest Hunting Safari's for over 25 years for:
    Osceola Turkey, Alligator and Whitetail on over
    75,000 acres of South Florida's most private pristine ranches.

    Alligator Processing in State Certified and Inspected Facility.
    Follow our clients results on Facebook:
    https://www.facebook.com/EvergladesAdventures
  • dew mandew man Posts: 16 Greenhorn
    couldn't swallow the BS to be one of THEM...which is why I am self dependant
    Cant swallow the bs, so why then should we have to listen to you and swallow your bs?
  • huntmstrhuntmstr Posts: 6,290 Admiral
    Mark, I'm pretty sure David was being sarcastic on this issue and his post intended to show the hypocrisy of the whole situation.

    The rest of you, play nice. It's been pretty easy going around here lately. Don't go making work for me and James now.
    Bushnell, Primos and Final Approach Pro Staff. Proud member of the Fab Five, Big Leaugers and Bobble Head 4.

    I had you pissed off at hello.
  • David BDavid B Posts: 1,907 Captain
    I should have clarified my sarcasm. I apologize.
    I have problems with this notion that the ranchers should be paid for their loss due to predation. That money is coming from you and I and others, not some magical funding source.
    The article states that almost 10% of the calves were lost. When looking at 400 calves and reading that 10 were lost, that doesn't add up (bad reporting or an inflated quote). 10% of 400 would be 40. 10 calves would be 2.5% loss to predation. I can show you statistical reports that state 3.7% death rate occurs in calves due to nitrate toxicosis annually. There are further reports that show even further numbers of death beyond this. We do not pay directly to the Rancher for these deaths. It is the cost of operation. Now lets look at the argument that by saving this land from development that we are saving the panther.
    The JB Ranch was recently ranked third in a three tier ranking system for protection and funding from the FLDEP.
    Here is the listing from the DEP and the land uses that occur on the ranch.
    J B Ranch
    6657
    Collier
    Pasture - 2170 Row Crops - 515 Natural Areas - 3966
    Agricultural/Rural
    Cow/calf operation, row crops, hunting & mining
    NRCS EQIP-A, CSP, WHIP, & FWC-FNAI Managed Lands
    The ranch was purchased by the James family in the 1940s as a cow/calf operation. The original name of the property is JB Ranch, with the previous owners making most of the improvements. The ranch is well maintained with the improvements and land being in very good condition. The landowners take any opportunity that presents itself to make an economic return on the property without compromising the natural values of the property. Additional revenue generation activities include rock mining, oil and gas drilling, high-end outfitter hunting, crop leasing, etc. This ranch is an excellent example of a well-integrated agriculture operation with conservation considerations.
    Do you see where I find fault with this reasoning about the article and those asking for a predation fee for their losses. The Florida Cattle Rancher has been enjoying the rise in the cost of calves at the market now for two years. Some speculate that it will continue. Calves sales have exceeded an all time high.
    I agree with you on many points about the panther and it's current population levels. I am not hugging the kitty as you may have thought by my initial posting. There is a carry capacity for the current population and that must be accepted, be it a number much less than anything historical before Florida became what it is. I won't move to Arizona and try to farm corn and then ask for monies when it fails and the rancher shouldn't be expecting anything when they ranch within the traditional range of predators either.
    Increasing MMGW or climate change, one twist off at a time.
  • binellishtrbinellishtr Posts: 8,797 Admiral
    MY BS? I didn't write the article dewman...i just commented on the article which I am free to do
  • Lead slingerLead slinger Posts: 449 Officer
    David B wrote: »
    I should have clarified my sarcasm. I apologize.
    I have problems with this notion that the ranchers should be paid for their loss due to predation. That money is coming from you and I and others, not some magical funding source.
    The article states that almost 10% of the calves were lost. When looking at 400 calves and reading that 10 were lost, that doesn't add up (bad reporting or an inflated quote). 10% of 400 would be 40. 10 calves would be 2.5% loss to predation. I can show you statistical reports that state 3.7% death rate occurs in calves due to nitrate toxicosis annually. There are further reports that show even further numbers of death beyond this. We do not pay directly to the Rancher for these deaths. It is the cost of operation. Now lets look at the argument that by saving this land from development that we are saving the panther.
    The JB Ranch was recently ranked third in a three tier ranking system for protection and funding from the FLDEP.
    Here is the listing from the DEP and the land uses that occur on the ranch.
    J B Ranch
    6657
    Collier
    Pasture - 2170 Row Crops - 515 Natural Areas - 3966
    Agricultural/Rural
    Cow/calf operation, row crops, hunting & mining
    NRCS EQIP-A, CSP, WHIP, & FWC-FNAI Managed Lands
    The ranch was purchased by the James family in the 1940s as a cow/calf operation. The original name of the property is JB Ranch, with the previous owners making most of the improvements. The ranch is well maintained with the improvements and land being in very good condition. The landowners take any opportunity that presents itself to make an economic return on the property without compromising the natural values of the property. Additional revenue generation activities include rock mining, oil and gas drilling, high-end outfitter hunting, crop leasing, etc. This ranch is an excellent example of a well-integrated agriculture operation with conservation considerations.
    Do you see where I find fault with this reasoning about the article and those asking for a predation fee for their losses. The Florida Cattle Rancher has been enjoying the rise in the cost of calves at the market now for two years. Some speculate that it will continue. Calves sales have exceeded an all time high.
    I agree with you on many points about the panther and it's current population levels. I am not hugging the kitty as you may have thought by my initial posting. There is a carry capacity for the current population and that must be accepted, be it a number much less than anything historical before Florida became what it is. I won't move to Arizona and try to farm corn and then ask for monies when it fails and the rancher shouldn't be expecting anything when they ranch within the traditional range of predators either.

    One of the best uses of common sense I've read on this forum in a long time.

    This is just another subsidy, welfare, government teat whichever you deem it to be when money is handed out that you don't agree with but agree with when it's dealing with something you support.
  • flydownflydown Posts: 6,464 Admiral
    One of the best uses of common sense I've read on this forum in a long time.

    This is just another subsidy, welfare, government teat whichever you deem it to be when money is handed out that you don't agree with but agree with when it's dealing with something you support.

    Agree. I understand the the conditions have changed for cattle ranchers, and I have to say, I'd be a bit bent out of shape with our government's devotion to the cat who's domain is diminishing. But it is the cattleman that must adapt and change. Lord knows the panthers aren't going anywhere.
    The only thing constant in this life is change.
    DYING for me was the most HE could do. LIVING for HIM is the least I can do
  • FLDXTFLDXT Posts: 2,521 Captain
    Keyboards...its easy behind a keyboard.
  • David BDavid B Posts: 1,907 Captain
    FLDXT, if that is in reference to my post, I understand where you are coming from. I am not knocking your living and all that it faces. Raising stock is a tough 24/7 365 job. From my perspective I don't how Ranchers can expect the taxpayers to pay for their losses based on an animal that has been here long before any of us. The very Conservation Easement agreements that many sign, actually accomplish the goal of the predator. One can't stand for something such as that and then not accept the risk that comes from doing so. To place the burden financially on the taxpayer is irresponsible and illogical. How many calves are lost to predation from Vultures( Buzzards, Caracara,Eagles), coyotes and bears? It seems that these losses would be equivocal in monetary terms. As a business seeking relief from loss due to nature, how do these differ financially or biologically?
    Increasing MMGW or climate change, one twist off at a time.
  • FLDXTFLDXT Posts: 2,521 Captain
    David B wrote: »
    FLDXT, if that is in reference to my post, I understand where you are coming from. I am not knocking your living and all that it faces. Raising stock is a tough 24/7 365 job. From my perspective I don't how Ranchers can expect the taxpayers to pay for their losses based on an animal that has been here long before any of us. The very Conservation Easement agreements that many sign, actually accomplish the goal of the predator. One can't stand for something such as that and then not accept the risk that comes from doing so. To place the burden financially on the taxpayer is irresponsible and illogical. How many calves are lost to predation from Vultures( Buzzards, Caracara,Eagles), coyotes and bears? It seems that these losses would be equivocal in monetary terms. As a business seeking relief from loss due to nature, how do these differ financially or biologically?

    What happens when a new development moves into an area, woods and pasture are destroyed to build houses that are being purchased by tax payers. Well what happens to the animals? Well they have to go somewhere. So the rancher that has had land in his family, making a living, for generations is now over run with animals that are displaced by all the new movement to Florida, predators and non-predators alike. So how is this the rancher's fault? He hasn't had a problem for generations? Let's not forget who puts that cheeseburger or steak on your grill. Keep trying the American rancher and agriculture and you can start speaking Chinese, because that's where your food will come from.
  • Captjohn5150Captjohn5150 Posts: 1,698 Captain
    It's real simple...by an act of legislation in the state of florida....make sure that the current ranch land or ag land can never be used for anything other than ag/ranch land....no development...no more condos, shopping centers, gas stations or even a church....we need this open land left open.....enough is enough....devalue the land to stay dirt cheap ag land....if a farmer or ranch wants to sell it, fine, but its for ag use only.....I hate to say it but we are running out of land...we need to keep it as is or we are going to super major issues....
    For the love of all outdoors recreational activities....what my spelling is off, that will learn ya. Pimping ain't easy unless u went to FSU, its a BS course.
    What do u get when you can connect the dots, color inside the lines, and get your release papers.....sentence served, times up at Felon sentenced university.
    Floridas first woman's college.
    The only difference between FSU and all the other colleges are other colleges accept you into the university's. At FSU you are taken into custody.
  • binellishtrbinellishtr Posts: 8,797 Admiral
    It's real simple...by an act of legislation in the state of florida....make sure that the current ranch land or ag land can never be used for anything other than ag/ranch land....no development...no more condos, shopping centers, gas stations or even a church....we need this open land left open.....enough is enough....devalue the land to stay dirt cheap ag land....if a farmer or ranch wants to sell it, fine, but its for ag use only.....I hate to say it but we are running out of land...we need to keep it as is or we are going to super major issues....

    totally agree...but let's not put 350 panthers in a cage with insufficient land/and or available sustainable food supply for all.

    This land is my land, and their land....not their land, which FWS and FWC have forgotten,
  • huntmstrhuntmstr Posts: 6,290 Admiral
    We are not running out of land. Florida is still 60% +/- undeveloped from what it was when the first settlers landed. Nationally speaking, if we put the entire population of the US into the density of a city like Houston, we would only take up a little less than the state of Texas to house every person in the US.

    What we are running out of is common sense. What we have no lack of are excuses.

    To every causation there is an effect and visa versa. Many of the ranchers and farmers or their heirs have put the rest of the ranchers and farmers in the predicament they are in now by selling land to development when the patriarch dies or when the market is right for the selling. Here in my own back yard I have witnessed both scenarios. And although it saddens me to see so much land get developed, it is the right of the land owner to do so without reprisal from the public or the government. That's the burden and right that property ownership brings.

    In terms of food and providing livestock for meat or produce for consumption, farm bill subsidy, as well as conservation easements and other government programs designed to pay farmers and ranchers for not producing, for losses or for other hazards, has added as much to the problem insomuch as they have created the dangerous affect of instances where loss is more lucrative than production.

    The panther predation suggestion is no different in that sense.

    And while I firmly believe in and appreciate the struggles of ranchers in today's ever increasing climate of urban encroachment, it is to a good degree a problem of their own making. No one forces them to sell their land. No one forces them to stay in the business. As far as what foods we produce and how much we need... suffice to say we are still the top producer of most of the world's beef, chicken, pork and grain. Only some of the produce we purchase is imported from South America and that is usually seasonal. The majority of the foods we consume are domestic and there is plenty left over for export.

    I agree with David on this issue and the way he has voiced his opinion. Clearly there is a median level of predation to be expected and clearly most of the larger ranching operation are well diversified in their business model. Anyone ranching on a large scale that is not diversified and invested in other resource based business is either stupid, hard headed or both. I refuse to accept them crying poor-mouth when the economics are clearly in their favor and the consumer and tax payer is the one left to foot the bill.
    Bushnell, Primos and Final Approach Pro Staff. Proud member of the Fab Five, Big Leaugers and Bobble Head 4.

    I had you pissed off at hello.
  • gladesmangladesman Posts: 1,362 Officer
    dew man wrote: »
    Cant swallow the bs, so why then should we have to listen to you and swallow your bs?

    Simple answer dew man - Freedom of Speech

    This site is like America - If u don't like it leave it.
  • gladesmangladesman Posts: 1,362 Officer
    huntmstr wrote: »
    Mark, I'm pretty sure David was being sarcastic on this issue and his post intended to show the hypocrisy of the whole situation.

    The rest of you, play nice. It's been pretty easy going around here lately. Don't go making work for me and James now.

    Freedom of Speech should rule unless folks get to cussing - personally I think that is OK too.

    Serious issues bring out passion - that passion should be allowed to flow - we are under enough totalitarian control from the dear sweet government and that's just about more than any reasonable American should stand for.

    If anyone thinks this thread is getting hot wait until I post what I'm gettin ready to - maybe the next on the list.
  • gladesmangladesman Posts: 1,362 Officer
    flydown wrote: »
    Agree. I understand the the conditions have changed for cattle ranchers, and I have to say, I'd be a bit bent out of shape with our government's devotion to the cat who's domain is diminishing. But it is the cattleman that must adapt and change. Lord knows the panthers aren't going anywhere.
    The only thing constant in this life is change.

    Yep - We're due for a lot less panther loving.

    That would be a great change.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Digital Now Included!

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

Preview This Month's Issue

Buy Digital Single Issues

Don't miss an issue.
Buy single digital issue for your phone or tablet.

Buy Single Digital Issue on the Florida Sportsman App

Other Magazines

See All Other Magazines

Special Interest Magazines

See All Special Interest Magazines

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Florida Sportsman stories delivered right to your inbox.

Advertisement

Phone Icon

Get Digital Access.

All Florida Sportsman subscribers now have digital access to their magazine content. This means you have the option to read your magazine on most popular phones and tablets.

To get started, click the link below to visit mymagnow.com and learn how to access your digital magazine.

Get Digital Access

Not a Subscriber?
Subscribe Now