Of course you can. You can develop a course of action that ensures your safety and removes each and every threat within your household.
You may end up in jail one day. There is a difference between ensuring your safety and hiding bodies to entice further intrusion that would not have occurred.
You may end up in jail one day. There is a difference between ensuring your safety and hiding bodies to entice further intrusion that would not have occurred.
There are those words again........."enticing intrusion." Sounds like victim blaming to me. Am I enticing intrusion because I didn't shoot you during an earlier home invasion? I would have thought the sound of multiple gunshots would have nixed the enticement issue.
I like the fact he killed these worthless pices of crap BUT, what he did imo was murder. He was a hunter. He set a plan in motion and had the intent to kill. IF you did not have the intent or homicidal tendencies, I would think a NORMAL person would not welcome a home burgulary. He was angry, and vengeful because he suspected they robbed him before.
If I were on that jury, I'd convict. They got it right.
Two criminals are killed during a commission of a felony. Not phuxs given by me.
Straight white male living a life of privilege and proud of it.
"The greatest pleasure is to vanquish your enemies and chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth and see those dear to them bathed in tears, to ride their horses and clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters."
12 citizens found him guilty in a trial, but on here is innocent.
:grin
:troll Maybe they think he is not guilty. Did you have an issue with the OJ verdict? How about the Casey Anthony verdict? How about the Zman verdict?
Straight white male living a life of privilege and proud of it.
"The greatest pleasure is to vanquish your enemies and chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth and see those dear to them bathed in tears, to ride their horses and clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters."
"The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function." F. Scott Fitzgerald
"Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr
Yep. A system were I rule by decree. You asked why anyone would have an issue of a conviction by jury in a "fair" trail. Why wouldn't someone have an issue with that? I gave examples of three "fair" trials that a great number of people have issues with.
Straight white male living a life of privilege and proud of it.
"The greatest pleasure is to vanquish your enemies and chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth and see those dear to them bathed in tears, to ride their horses and clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters."
Yep. A system were I rule by decree. You asked why anyone would have an issue of a conviction by jury in a "fair" trail. Why wouldn't someone have an issue with that? I gave examples of three "fair" trials that a great number of people have issues with.
Ok, you can have an issue, but it won't change the outcome, or mean anything in the next verdict someone disagrees with.
I like the fact he killed these worthless pices of crap BUT, what he did imo was murder. He was a hunter. He set a plan in motion and had the intent to kill. IF you did not have the intent or homicidal tendencies, I would think a NORMAL person would not welcome a home burgulary. He was angry, and vengeful because he suspected they robbed him before.
If I were on that jury, I'd convict. They got it right.
I think we'll have to agree to disagree on what "normal people" would do or think. If I were a victim of multiple burglaries by drug addicts who incidentally had also stolen some of my weapons I would definitely be angry and prepared to take action for the inevitable "next time."
The prosecutor in this case convinced a jury that this homeowner "welcomed" a home invasion but my sense of it is he wanted them to stop. Is that not what a "normal" person would want? He had called the police to try to get the burglaries to stop. But that didn't work out.
He was a hunter, you and I are prior military trained with guns, trained to kill........I forfeit no rights under the Castle Doctrine because of my skill sets. When my 1911 goes bang during a home invasion it is with the intent to kill, and I will be angry and say a few expletives in the process. I might even toss the bullet ridden carcass into the front yard for easy pick up and to reduce the mess on my floor and the trauma to my family.
I have a 60 inch flat screen visible through my bay windows to the street. It is known that I care for a terminally ill father and have prescription narcotics in the house. I leave my doors unlocked when I am home awake. There is video surveillance. I have a nice boat and vehicles parked about the property. But yet I sit on my sofa with my 7 yo and a concealed firearm "enjoying" the latest episode of My Little Pony. I am prepared for and have a plan to thwart a home invasion. So somehow I need to worry that a prosecuting atty is going to convince a jury that I enticed criminals to break into my house because I have nice stuff, and I was laying in wait with a weapon on my couch prepared and with plan to dispatch intruding criminal(s).
In FL I would like to think a homeowner would stand a better chance, but likely would come down to the skills of a defense atty and/or jury selection.
I think we'll have to agree to disagree on what "normal people" would do or think. If I were a victim of multiple burglaries by drug addicts who incidentally had also stolen my weapons I would definitely be angry and prepared to take action for the inevitable "next time."
The prosecutor in this case convinced a jury that this homeowner "welcomed" a home invasion but my sense of it is he wanted them to stop. Is that not what a "normal" person would want? He had called the police to try to get the burglaries to stop. But that didn't work out.
He was a hunter, you and I are prior military trained with guns, trained to kill........I forfeit no rights under the Castle Doctrine because if my skill sets. When my 1911 goes bang during a home invasion it is with the intent to kill, and I will be angry and say a few expletives in the process. I might even toss the bullet ridden carcass into the front yard for easy pick up and to reduce the mess on my floor and the trauma to my family.
I have a 60 inch flat screen visible through my bay windows to the street. It is known that I care for a terminally ill father and have prescription narcotics in the house. I leave my doors unlocked when I am home awake. There is video surveillance. I have a nice boat and vehicles parked about the property. But yet I sit on my sofa with my 7 yo and a concealed firearm "enjoying" the latest episode of My Little Pony. I am prepared for and have a plan to thwart a home invasion. So somehow I need to worry that a prosecuting atty is going to convince a jury that I enticed criminals to break into my house because I have nice stuff, and I was laying in wait with a weapon on my couch prepared and with plan to dispatch intruding criminal(s).
In FL I would like to think a homeowner would stand a better chance, but likely would come down to the skills of a defense atty and/or jury selection.
You are paranoid.
Go to 13:30 in the freaking recording if you think he is innocent. IF anyone still thinks he is innocent then you are freaking STUPID! HE says "sorry about that" then murders her and calls her a *****.
And the jackazz waited until the next day to have a neighbor call the police. ****?
Go to 13:30 in the freaking recording if you think he is innocent. IF anyone still thinks he is innocent then you are freaking STUPID! HE says "sorry about that" then murders her and calls her a *****.
And the jackazz waited until the next day to have a neighbor call the police. ****?
I think he said, "you die B". Pretty incriminating.
"The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function." F. Scott Fitzgerald
"Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr
court documents that were not allowed as evidence showed Brady had broken into Smith's house and garage before. Brady and Kifer were also linked to another burglary the day before they were killed; stolen prescription drugs were found in the car they were driving.
Judge Douglas Anderson excluded evidence about the teens' histories from the trial as irrelevant
Indeed, we sure wouldn't want anybody thinking ill of these two fine young men...
There are many roads to travel
Many things to do.
Knots to be unraveled
'fore the darkness falls on you
I'm just glad the dead teens were white. We don't have to listen to Jesse and Al flap their man pleasers.
Yes, it does remove that aspect
but it makes no diff to me...white black hispanic asian male female...scum is scum..I don't care what flavor you call it.
I doubt the world has lost much...
There are many roads to travel
Many things to do.
Knots to be unraveled
'fore the darkness falls on you
The big picture is the guy did society a favor. A couple of dead perps might prevent others from breaking into a home. The prosecutor on the other hand just made protecting ones property more difficult.
"The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function." F. Scott Fitzgerald
"Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr
12 citizens found him guilty in a trial, but on here is innocent.
:grin
He is not "innocent"...He did murder those two POS teens...no real loss to the state of Georgia.
His "planning" was flawed..as was his execution. Video and statements are what will convict someone..Remember, In AMERICA..they must prove the case...
The smart defendant says absolutely nothing other than " I wish to speak to a lawyer" before he says a word about what happened.
Two key points to keep in mind
1) Dead men tell no tales
2) even a fish wouldn't get caught if it kept its mouth shut.
There are many roads to travel
Many things to do.
Knots to be unraveled
'fore the darkness falls on you
He is not "innocent"...He did murder those two POS teens...no real loss to the state of Georgia.
His "planning" was flawed..as was his execution. Video and statements are what will convict someone..Remember, In AMERICA..they must prove the case...
The smart defendant says absolutely nothing other than " I wish to speak to a lawyer" before he says a word about what happened.
Two key points to keep in mind
1) Dead men tell no tales
2) even a fish wouldn't get caught if it kept its mouth shut.
Generally speaking, smart people don't commit murder. Even a whole lot of dumb people don't commit murder.
Go to 13:30 in the freaking recording if you think he is innocent.
FWIW MN law in this case.............
"The intentional taking of the life of another is not authorized by section 609.06, except when necessary in resisting or preventing an offense which the actor reasonably believes exposes the actor or another to great bodily harm or death, orpreventing the commission of a felony in the actor's place of abode."
Criminals in MN should think twice about home invasion. Even more so if the homeowner is really pissed or not quite right in the head.
All Florida Sportsman subscribers now have digital access to their magazine content. This means you have the option to read your magazine on most popular phones and tablets.
To get started, click the link below to visit mymagnow.com and learn how to access your digital magazine.
Replies
When a threat is removed and when a prone person is defenseless is a subjective call.
Not when you are recording it on video and audio.
Former Mini Mart Magnate
I am just here for my amusement.
Of course you can. You can develop a course of action that ensures your safety and removes each and every threat within your household.
You may end up in jail one day. There is a difference between ensuring your safety and hiding bodies to entice further intrusion that would not have occurred.
Former Mini Mart Magnate
I am just here for my amusement.
There are those words again........."enticing intrusion." Sounds like victim blaming to me. Am I enticing intrusion because I didn't shoot you during an earlier home invasion? I would have thought the sound of multiple gunshots would have nixed the enticement issue.
If I were on that jury, I'd convict. They got it right.
"The greatest pleasure is to vanquish your enemies and chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth and see those dear to them bathed in tears, to ride their horses and clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters."
:grin
"The greatest pleasure is to vanquish your enemies and chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth and see those dear to them bathed in tears, to ride their horses and clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters."
"Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr
Do you know of a better system of justice?
"The greatest pleasure is to vanquish your enemies and chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth and see those dear to them bathed in tears, to ride their horses and clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters."
Ok, you can have an issue, but it won't change the outcome, or mean anything in the next verdict someone disagrees with.
http://www.startribune.com/audio/257238931.html
I think we'll have to agree to disagree on what "normal people" would do or think. If I were a victim of multiple burglaries by drug addicts who incidentally had also stolen some of my weapons I would definitely be angry and prepared to take action for the inevitable "next time."
The prosecutor in this case convinced a jury that this homeowner "welcomed" a home invasion but my sense of it is he wanted them to stop. Is that not what a "normal" person would want? He had called the police to try to get the burglaries to stop. But that didn't work out.
He was a hunter, you and I are prior military trained with guns, trained to kill........I forfeit no rights under the Castle Doctrine because of my skill sets. When my 1911 goes bang during a home invasion it is with the intent to kill, and I will be angry and say a few expletives in the process. I might even toss the bullet ridden carcass into the front yard for easy pick up and to reduce the mess on my floor and the trauma to my family.
I have a 60 inch flat screen visible through my bay windows to the street. It is known that I care for a terminally ill father and have prescription narcotics in the house. I leave my doors unlocked when I am home awake. There is video surveillance. I have a nice boat and vehicles parked about the property. But yet I sit on my sofa with my 7 yo and a concealed firearm "enjoying" the latest episode of My Little Pony. I am prepared for and have a plan to thwart a home invasion. So somehow I need to worry that a prosecuting atty is going to convince a jury that I enticed criminals to break into my house because I have nice stuff, and I was laying in wait with a weapon on my couch prepared and with plan to dispatch intruding criminal(s).
In FL I would like to think a homeowner would stand a better chance, but likely would come down to the skills of a defense atty and/or jury selection.
Go to 13:30 in the freaking recording if you think he is innocent. IF anyone still thinks he is innocent then you are freaking STUPID! HE says "sorry about that" then murders her and calls her a *****.
And the jackazz waited until the next day to have a neighbor call the police. ****?
I think he said, "you die B". Pretty incriminating.
"Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr
Indeed, we sure wouldn't want anybody thinking ill of these two fine young men...
Many things to do.
Knots to be unraveled
'fore the darkness falls on you
Yep, a dead scummy female...what's your point?
Many things to do.
Knots to be unraveled
'fore the darkness falls on you
Yes, it does remove that aspect
but it makes no diff to me...white black hispanic asian male female...scum is scum..I don't care what flavor you call it.
I doubt the world has lost much...
Many things to do.
Knots to be unraveled
'fore the darkness falls on you
"Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr
He is not "innocent"...He did murder those two POS teens...no real loss to the state of Georgia.
His "planning" was flawed..as was his execution. Video and statements are what will convict someone..Remember, In AMERICA..they must prove the case...
The smart defendant says absolutely nothing other than " I wish to speak to a lawyer" before he says a word about what happened.
Two key points to keep in mind
1) Dead men tell no tales
2) even a fish wouldn't get caught if it kept its mouth shut.
Many things to do.
Knots to be unraveled
'fore the darkness falls on you
Generally speaking, smart people don't commit murder. Even a whole lot of dumb people don't commit murder.
I like that a lot.
"Well Gary, the easiest way to look tall is to stand in a room full of short people." - Curtis Bostick
"All these forums, with barely any activity, are like a neglected old cemetery that no one visits anymore."- anonymouse
FWIW MN law in this case.............
"The intentional taking of the life of another is not authorized by section 609.06, except when necessary in resisting or preventing an offense which the actor reasonably believes exposes the actor or another to great bodily harm or death, or preventing the commission of a felony in the actor's place of abode."
Criminals in MN should think twice about home invasion. Even more so if the homeowner is really pissed or not quite right in the head.
No, I guess not.
You're still here...
Now you went and done it Tanktard...I'm crying. :rotflmao
Many things to do.
Knots to be unraveled
'fore the darkness falls on you
Intelligence is the least reliable predictor of proclivity to commit murder as anything....
The difference between "smart" murderers and dumb ones...is that the smart ones walk free.
Many things to do.
Knots to be unraveled
'fore the darkness falls on you
Or are not identified.
"Well Gary, the easiest way to look tall is to stand in a room full of short people." - Curtis Bostick
"All these forums, with barely any activity, are like a neglected old cemetery that no one visits anymore."- anonymouse