Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: red snapper bag limit might be reduced to 1 fish

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Eufaula, Alabama
    Posts
    557
    Let there be no mistake. Once they get this saltwater thing handled, they will come after the freshwater, and then the hunting etc. They know they can't tackle all at one time without more backlash than they can handle, so they are attacking each one. Right now the interior states don't care what happens in salt water because it doesn't affect them, so it will be reasonable to assume that the coastal states probably won't care when they attack the freshwater or hunting. Just my humble opinion, but I'm convinced that the environmentalists are behind this, and they won't rest until all hunting & fishing is outlawed.
    In my many years, I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame,two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress.-- John Adams

  2. #12
    Senior Member mustang190's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Panama City Fla.
    Posts
    2,117
    Quote Originally Posted by Eggsuckindog View Post
    Did you really think we want those laws observed?” said Dr. Ferris. “We want them to be broken. You’d better get it straight that it’s not a bunch of boy scouts you’re up against... We’re after power and we mean it... There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that’s the system, Mr. Reardon, that’s the game, and once you understand it, you’ll be much easier to deal with.” (’Atlas Shrugged’ 1957)

    note the date gentlemen, it has been a long time coming, on a second note we as Americans and decendents of said individuals that felt compelled to revolt against the King of England did so for what reasons - anybody? Bueller?

    damn, what comes around goes around I guess
    Post of the year!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •