Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 68

Thread: Mendy's first Red Fish(50" Bull)

  1. #21
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6
    Nice!!! Some pigs!!

  2. #22
    Moderator kajo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    saint johns florida
    Posts
    2,799
    so with tonys logic (makes sense) using the math calculations really wont work with a bull red because of the air bladder and void of space in its belly..makes sense.

    i wish i had a scale to weigh the 58"er i got..i always wondered what the true weight was on that fish.
    julington creek carpet care

    www.jccarpetcare.com

  3. #23
    Senior Member Boattronics's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Atlantic Beach, Florida
    Posts
    2,794
    Most all fish have an air bladder, Im sure those calcs are close..... just think reds seem to be lighter than most other species at the same length. 58"?????? I would freak out!
    Tony Eden, Marine electronics, electrical and accesories rigging & repair master
    http://www.boattronics.net/
    Over 50 seperate, recent reviews from captains on this forum-
    http://forums.floridasportsman.com/s...ronics-reviews!
    Please contact me today with any questions or for a free estimate!

  4. #24
    Moderator kajo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    saint johns florida
    Posts
    2,799
    I did. It hit a 12" mullet. Thought it was a poon at first
    julington creek carpet care

    www.jccarpetcare.com

  5. #25
    Senior Member Brother Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    J-ville
    Posts
    154
    To officially weigh a fish for the records it has to be weighed on land....which would be illegal if caught in a boat. moving the fish to land for weighing would be considered a harvest I believe....but from the beach?? that's a different story...

  6. #26
    Senior Member Morocco_madness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    742
    Boattronics its all good man. I do think this Red was over 50lbs But whether it was or not doesn't even matter. Even if it were its a lost cause now lol. You guys had a good day yesterday. Nice Reds dude.

  7. #27
    Senior Member Brother Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    J-ville
    Posts
    154
    He looked over 50 to me....easily. Look what black drum weigh and they aren't that long....just fat! That sucker had a serious head on him...nice fish..

    Quote Originally Posted by Morocco_madness View Post
    Boattronics its all good man. I do think this Red was over 50lbs But whether it was or not doesn't even matter. Even if it were its a lost cause now lol. You guys had a good day yesterday. Nice Reds dude.

  8. #28
    Senior Member Morocco_madness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    742
    In the 70's Reds were fished nearly to extinction. Regulations got passed and the numbers have been getting better yearly ever since. In the late 70's(not based on my personal experience, too young), you could only find Rat Reds in our water ways. Larger Bulls were considered rare to most people. 40 years pass and we are getting a lot of good numbers now on the Bulls. Based on common sense, if we know these animals have a life span of 50-60 years, and they have recently gotten numbers back up, we will have started to see sizes not common for our area. So yes, in the past a 50-70lb Red was unheard of in these parts. Based on the calculation i just broke down, we will have no choice but to see even larger Reds in the next 10 years. This is why North and South Carolinas see 100+ LBs Reds. They didn't hurt their stocks nearly as bad as we did. This isn't a pissing contest attempt by any means, just an outside the box view of whats taking place within our Redfish stock. You can ask anyone that fished Jacksonville water in the 70's and they will tell you the species was nearly wiped out. The result was an unusual number of juvenile fish. Jacksonville Snook are another good example, although they were crippled by freezes and not so much by over fishing.

  9. #29
    Senior Member samsiam74's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Jax
    Posts
    1,117
    If you're gonna weigh them, it might be less traumatic to the fish to rig a sling.. Just my .02.....

    Again, one heck of a Bull!!! Very nice!

  10. #30
    Senior Member Slug-O's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Nocatee
    Posts
    1,459
    Quote Originally Posted by samsiam74 View Post
    If you're gonna weigh them, it might be less traumatic to the fish to rig a sling.. Just my .02.....

    Again, one heck of a Bull!!! Very nice!
    That's my idea too..
    If a "Blur" passes you on the open water with fishing rods and "highway to Hell" playing.....its just me....

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •