Which person had injuries from being beaten?Originally Posted by ben17
Which person had injuries from being beaten?
No matter how peaceful, humanitarian and tolerant you are, no matter how well-meaning and honorable your goals - if you ask for a new government law, program or plan, ultimately that program will be paid for with property taken by force from others and the law will be enforced at the point of a gun.
Yup deep, I'm an Internet tough guy. Really? C'mon man, you don't agree with me so you have to call me names. You don't know me at all, nor what I carry, if I even carry. Do people get shot with their own guns sure...not this time tho. Allegedly TM circled back around and accosted Z when he returned to his vehicle. Allegedly at this point TM attacked Z, this made him the aggressor. Allegedly TM saw
Z's weapon while he was on top of him punching him in the face. Allegedly TM told Z at this point " you're going to die "
This is all pretty much hearsay from Z's father, so we don't know what is actual fact.
My point Deep was simply I understand why Z pulled the trigger and I think it was a justified shooting.
Tragic none the less. Doesn't make me a tough guy and I refuse to grow up. Been there done that, it's no fun.
I hope you have a better day.
Survival is not mandatory.....
How do you know Martin didn't have injuries?
No way of knowing. One mans word against a dead one, anything Zimmerman says can not be taken as being factual.
________________________________
"Round ‘em up and ship ‘em home ... ."
Apparently, he had at least one. And it was a doozy!
NO. no. You are inept, just as so many are on each side of this. Fact is no one should be on either side till the investigation is over. But I have to post when one side goes and claims something as blatantly incorrect(wrong) as what you claim.
The dispatcher did NOT tell him to "NOT FOLLOW" Trayvon. I have stated before how fortunate, or well-trained, the Dispatcher was. When Zimmerman was continuing to follow trayvon the Dispatcher stated, "We do not need you to do that." THAT is NOT telling Zimmerman to not follow Trayvon.
That was fantastic wording. What it was intended to do was take the Dispatcher off the hook for what happened. If Zimmerman had quit following Trayvon and Trayvon would have mugged and raped a little ol lady then the Dispatcher could just as easily say that they did not tell him to not follow Trayvon. They just said they did not need him to.
So everyone should WAIT, and hold their tongues..especially those that want to slant the truth.
Last edited by Frisbee; 04-11-2012 at 12:39 PM.
The injuries were made public. Zimmermans were reported and if Martin had any(other than the bullet hole) they certainly would have been made public. This is not about someones words but rather public evidence.
No matter how peaceful, humanitarian and tolerant you are, no matter how well-meaning and honorable your goals - if you ask for a new government law, program or plan, ultimately that program will be paid for with property taken by force from others and the law will be enforced at the point of a gun.
Good one!
Who would make the Martin injuries public? I have not even heard where he was shot.
Big b injuries do not tell you who attacked who. You know better than that.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote