Discharges - Page 4
REPORTSREGIONSFORECASTPHOTOSBOATINGHOW-TOSPORTFISHGEARVIDEOSSTORE
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: Discharges

  1. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,376
    millions of dollars and many hours people waste on fighting over what is right... think about it. what's left to save?

  2. #32
    Senior Member ANUMBER1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Ozello Fl.
    Posts
    8,018
    Quote Originally Posted by testerman28 View Post
    Anumber1.. why do you not think that a good portion of this will not be the product of big sugar?
    are you one of those guys who are paid to go against other peoples posts?
    I ask because everything that someone brings up you have an answer for at 7,900+ posts and if you read them they are usually stirring the pot.
    maybe that's just another reason this site is not even going anywhere??? maybe it has nothing to do with cold weather maybe a mirror is what you need..?
    my photo was from Crystal River and the flooding from the Withlacoochee River due to Irma.
    Tannic acid stained water flowing north from the Green Swamp into the gulf.

    Kinda like the human hockey that flows from Orlando south into the lake then sent east and west during rain events like Irma.


    BTW, good edit darciyssle!
    I am glad to only be a bird hunter with bird dogs...being a shooter or dog handler or whatever other niche exists to separate appears to generate far too much about which to worry.

  3. #33
    Senior Member Darcy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Cape Coral
    Posts
    1,709
    Yeh. I’ve learned not to feed the trolls, the animals, or the bored disgruntled old people.
    Last edited by Darcy; 11-14-2017 at 01:24 PM. Reason: Added the word disgruntled, for those folks who check edits.
    "No i'm NOT Darcizzle!"


    https://captainsforcleanwater.org

  4. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    641
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron@.38 Special View Post
    A few comments for the recent posts.
    1. Backpumping. Not a normal process with any real quantity, however when they backpump, in many cases the water is cleaner than that coming in the lake from the North.
    2. The EAA reservoir. If we had it now, we would still be discharging into both East and West discharge points. The EAA would have only stopped about 10% of the discharge with all the water we got from Irma.
    3. Moving water South. Can't do it now, everything is full to the brim from the conservation areas to Everglades National Park.

    Fact: The north plan to store water North of the lake is faster, cheaper, and more efficient at keeping our water clean than any reservoir to the South.

    Oh, but I don't know anything about it, I only Built phase 1 of STA 1W, Southern end of STA2, The Periphiton STA demo project, Parts of STA 3/4, Pump stations 335, 370, 372, STA 5 Discharge canal and bridge, etc etc etc.........With that kind of investment in this work, I pay attention to every single aspect of what is going on in the Everglades water issues.

    Heck, when the FS gods started that thread to propose a new reservoir, I told them it would not happen and the only option was the old EAA site. After great argument by others, what happened???? The old EAA site!

    You can be passionate about the issue, but it is very complicated to understand all the constraints on any plan you choose.
    FACTS:
    January 2016- Back pumped 3 BILLION GALLONS into the lake from the south.
    June 2017- Back pumped 5.7 BILLION GALLONS into the lake from the south.
    September 2017- Back pumped 3.7 BILLION GALLONS into the lake from the south

  5. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    641
    Quote Originally Posted by Darcy View Post
    Yeh. I’ve learned not to feed the trolls, the animals, or the bored disgruntled old people.

  6. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    153
    1. 700,000 acres of sugar fields get perfect irrigation and perfect drainage in all conditions, year in, year out, flood or drought....to all other stakeholders detriment.

    2. Big Sugar controls FL water policy through control of Tallahassee, FL Chamber, etc.

    3. Mitch Hutchcraft is a VP for King’s Ranch, a sugar farmer in the EAA. I wouldn’t call his opinion ‘unbiased’ by any stretch.

    4. Septic tanks are a far less significant source of nutrients into the IRL compared to the discharges and local AG runoff. Less than 10% by most accounts.

    5. I guess nice prediction on the A1/A2 Ron, but SB10 wasn’t downsized to those parcels for any scientific reason whatsoever. It was purely political - sugar made a deal with the Democrats (through minority leader Sen Jeff Clemens who has since resigned) the night before the senate vote for 60,000 acres of sugar land, and with no Dem support (just 1 out of 15 democratic senators stood strong - 6 votes were needed) Negron was left with no choice but to downsize the plan to its current form. It was actually quite disgusting to watch as it went down. But congrats?
    Last edited by DPreston; 11-25-2017 at 07:15 PM.

  7. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    105
    Repeated post.
    Last edited by auburn fishing; 12-09-2017 at 06:55 AM. Reason: Repeated Post

  8. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    105
    Dec. 2017 issue of Florida Sportsman has a very good article, Lake O: Another Chance for Change:
    Lake O: Another Chance for Change
    By David Conway
    David Conway
    More From David Conway

    Time for Florida to get its act together.

    As seen on Google Earth, Sailfish Flats, near St. Lucie Inlet,
    was a flourishing seagrass meadow in December 2010, sea
    trout, mutton snapper, pinfish and countless other species:

    Attachment 248302 Please see article for
    attachment, sorry.

    During Hurricane Irma, much of Florida was awash in water.
    Lake Okeechobee was already high, in fact on its way to one
    of its recent historical highs. Yet sugar cane farmers south
    of the lake began pumping water from their fields, un-
    treated water, back into Lake O.
    The discharges to the
    coasts resumed, as did questions about the integrity of the
    dike at Lake O, while the sugar industry was adding to the
    height of the lake.

    “Even then, as another major storm, Hurricane Maria, was
    strengthening and its path was uncertain, possibly coming
    to Florida,” said Chris Maroney, one of the founders of ad-
    vocacy group Bullsugar, “they were backpumping. Those
    sugar growers pretend that they care about the people who
    live around the lake, but if they did they wouldn’t be pump-
    ing back into the Lake during those dangerous times. It’s all
    about sugar production and yield, and they’ve never had a
    bad year.”

    Now, for the first time in a long while, there’s a chance to
    change Florida’s destructive water management policies
    concerning Lake O, the Everglades and estuaries to the east
    and west, by constructing a new reservoir and water treat-
    ment facility as called for by Florida lawmakers earlier this
    year. It may turn out to be a breakthrough in a decades
    long saga, or yet another chance for change at risk of being
    squandered.

    Recent Google Earth image: Following heavy Lake Okeecho-
    bee discharges and algal blooms, the area was denuded of
    seagrass by early 2017. Without clean water it may never
    recover.

    Attachment 248303 Please see article for
    attachment, sorry.

    With public outrage high these last few years and the
    damages from discharges making national news, advocacy
    groups such as Bullsugar, Captains for Clean Water, and
    many other organizations, among them Rivers Coalition
    Defense Fund, Bonefish & Tarpon Trust, and The Everglades
    Foundation, grew much more vocal and influential. Combined
    with the outrage from citizens in the affected areas—finally,
    state politicians knew that they had to do something. They
    passed Senate Bill 10 which legislates the construction of
    the storage reservoir and water treatment center in the
    Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA), whose purpose is to
    alleviate some of the damaging outflows to the coast and to
    clean water and supply it to the Everglades and Florida Bay
    in a more natural flow. As the new year’s legislative session
    is about to begin in January, crucial work to further the EAA
    reservoir project must be accomplished, on a federal level as
    well.

    Already there have been plenty of signs that Big Sugar,
    which fought S.B. 10, has been opposing the reservoir.
    As reported by The Miami Herald in October, U.S. Sugar
    spent 1.5 million dollars on pre-session legislative hearings
    to fight the SB 10 development.

    “The reason these problems perpetuate is because of the
    federal government subsidies to the sugar industry, and
    that industry turns around and invests that windfall profit
    into the political process,” says Bullsugar’s Maroney. “For
    instance, all of the storm water treatment areas in the EAA,
    to clean pollution out of the sugar fields, is paid for by the
    taxpayers. Sugar doesn’t even even pay for their own clean-
    up. They invest in lobbyists, politicians and public relations
    lobbying at every level. That is the reason that this problem
    is so entrenched.”

    Through late 2017, damages continue to mount from the
    Lake O releases to the coasts and constricted flow to Florida
    Bay—damages to Florida’s ecology, economy, culture and
    even the health of its people. There’s growing scientific evi-
    dence that cyanobacteria in algae— which can grow and
    bloom in the discharges— can produce toxins that are
    threats to human health, including an increased risk of
    causing cancers and liver disease mortality.


    The hope for change hinges on the successful development,
    planning and implementation of the EAA reservoir as direct-
    ed by S.B. 10. The amount of acreage for a water treatment
    flowway to accompany the reservoir needs to be established
    and arranged for, and there has to be a guarantee that the
    new storage and treatment system, once it is built, provides
    benefit to the natural system of Florida. If not, Maroney says
    with an eye to history, Big Sugar might well hijack the new
    reservoir system for its own use.

    “I would first and foremost thank the fishing industry and
    community for making this a priority to get fixed,” said Chris
    Wittman of the grassroots advocacy group Captains for Clean
    Water. “That’s a huge step toward fixing this issue. This is a
    problem that’s going to take a significant amount of time to
    fix. It’s very important for us to continue to get others to be-
    come more engaged in this and not get complacent, because
    the problem still looms. We will see this through over the next
    five or ten years, because our way of life is at stake, our eco-
    nomy, why we call Florida home, what we want to leave our
    future generations. It’s all at stake.”

    In the summer of 2013, the effects of Lake O discharges
    via the St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee rivers closed beaches,
    wrecked estuaries and shut down recreational fishing oppor-
    tunities. Stuart resident Chris Maroney and his associates
    were watching it all. “We saw that it was all part of an intent-
    ional water plan that is meant to maximize sugar cane yields
    in the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA),” Maroney recalled.
    “The problem is political. The real issue is that we have an
    incorrect prioritization of how we manage our water in South
    Florida, to the detriment of everyone else. Big Sugar mono-
    polizes all the storage, treatment and flow of the water.”

    Determined, Maroney and his colleagues founded Bullsugar
    in the summer of 2014. “What we’ve done, in addition to
    getting more people involved, is to get connected with all
    the other experts who’ve devoted their lives to fixing this
    problem, and to get us all working together. The Now or
    Neverglades declaration supports the settled science behind
    the solution. S.B. 10 could be that solution, if the details are
    done right.”

    The year 2016 saw unusual winter and spring rains. South of
    Tampa, people speculated that the discharges from Lake O
    coming out the Caloosahatchee might have forced the tarpon
    schools to the north more quickly than usual.

    Captain Chris Wittman, a native of Ft. Myers, saw the effects
    of massive discharges in February, a rarity, during tourist
    season. “Along with a lot of other guides,” he says, “I saw
    an alarming drop in business, as did hotels with their North-
    ern visitors. Our clients are return visitors, and they book
    multi-day trips. Meanwhile, their families can enjoy the
    beaches. They don’t want to spend their hard earned money
    when the fishing is poor from the freshwater discharges. At
    the same time, the beaches are ruined with the dark, muddy
    and often polluted fresh water.

    “The discharges pour directly into San Carlos Bay,” Chris
    explains, “from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee and the
    southern part of Pine Island Sound, and over into Fort
    Myers Beach and Estero Bay, and depending on the wind,
    it can stretch 30, 35 miles north or south.”

    Wittman, along with friend and fellow charter captain Daniel
    Andrew, founded Captains for Clean Water, a grass roots
    advocacy group which quickly grew in size and strength
    to become a voice for those who want to see better water
    quality and better water management policy in Florida.

    “We took a unique approach by showing impacts to the eco-
    nomy and quality of life of those affected by the discharges,”
    said Wittman. “This doesn’t just affect Lee and Martin coun-
    ties. It affects all of us, including Florida Bay to the south,
    coral reefs, and Biscayne Bay. We have to solve the water
    management crisis for all of Floridians.

    “Captains for Clean Water was founded to solve this problem
    once and for all. We work with policymakers to act in the
    interest of the will of the people of this state. The angling
    community is the most affected group, and historically they
    haven’t been involved with the solution. We’re here to change
    that.”

    Wittman points out an important development to the success
    of S.B. 10 and the fight for change in Florida water manage-
    ment—the growing participation of recreational fishing and
    outdoor industry partners.

    “Now companies such as Mustad Hooks, SeaDeck, Yeti, Orvis,
    Simms and many others have joined forces with Captains for
    Clean Water to work towards a solution. The reason we’re
    starting to see some progress with this issue is because of the
    engagement of the fishing industry. Once fishermen became
    engaged, the industry started to get involved, and that’s how
    this problem will be fixed.”

    “At any rate,” emphasizes Karl Wickstrom, founder of Florida
    Sportsman and a leader of the Rivers Coalition which has been
    documenting the discharge horrors for more than three dec-
    ades, “the long fight to save the estuaries is far from over. We
    have no choice but to double our efforts to stop the polluters
    in their self-serving tracks.” FS

    Field & Stream, a nationally known outdoor sports magazine,
    in the Dec. '17-Jan. '18 issue, ran the article, Marsh
    Madness
    , on p. 24, by Hal Herring -addressing this abuse
    from the big agriculture lobby and posing solutions that must
    be implemented to avert further damage so that restoration
    for this habitat can take place.
    Last edited by auburn fishing; 12-09-2017 at 06:46 AM.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •